Not the fastest time, but Randy was having fun at least!
Jaguar XKR-S lap time at Laguna Seca (post 1988)
Track | Laguna Seca (post 1988) |
Type | flying start |
Vehicle | Jaguar XKR-S (550 PS) |
Power / weight | 551 ps / 1843 kg |
Driver | Randy Pobst |
Time | 1:42.900 |
Average speed | 126 kph (78 mph) |
Submitted | 13 years ago by anonymous |
Views | 3.8k |
Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swF3XklaWaE&feature=g-all-u
BR2, 13y ago
Same, im not gonna say i wouldnt spend that much on it, because it looks absolutley fabulous, the best looking Jaguar, in a Long time, (Or possibly ever) its a gorgeous car.
If its pure performance were talking about based on price(Which Most ppl tend to look at)
0-60Mph 4.0s
0-100Mph 8.3s
0-186Mph 39.4s
1/4 Mile 12.2@123.4Mph
And its Track times are Meh, 1:14.4 Hockenheim, 1:23.2 Top Gear Track, Laguna Seca 1:42.9..
Granted it is heavy(4,005Lbs), But still, 550Bhp and thas what you get?
But thats only from a person only interested in pure speed(Which isnt me) But, at that price, id rather go for a 997.2 911 GT3, a ZO6, a GT-R, M5 etc for me anyway.
I just cant help but see a sense of fail in this car(As much as i dont want to admit it)
phavyarden 13y ago
I'm with u mate, it looks good, but for that price, i'll take something a lot quicker, or maybe 2 or 3 cars that also looks good(nos as good as this one), and same quick
BR2, 13y ago
This car looks good, but at £101,725 Fully Done, or $138,670, And with its..Interesting track times and acceleration, would it be worth it? Fail? Or Achieved?
I personally wouldnt buy one for that price, but 550bhp for that isnt bad, it looks wonderful, but seems a bit pricey to me for what it can d, but thats only based on its performance. which i dont care about.