21 Ferrari returns to turbo with the California T

Cover for Ferrari returns to turbo with the California T

Ferrari has "cracked under pressure" and turned to the "dark side" of forced induction.

Throttle response perfection and free-revving purity will give way for lower emissions and fuel consumption. It's more "common sense" and less "irrational emotion" for Ferrari's new entry level V8 convertible.

At least it's still a V8.

This brand new Ferrari engine will join a host of successful twin turbo V8 implementations from BMW, Mercedes, Audi and others.

These companies have been very successful with V8 TT engines, so Ferrari isn't risking much here - it's a formula that is known to work and produce very little, if any, loss of driving pleasure in exchange for superior dynamics, especially under low RPM.

California is not only a revolutionary engine under the hood, it is also a pretty redesign of the first generation California, with much of the lines derived from the Ferrari F12 Berlinetta.

11y ago by FastestLaps
User avatar
User avatar

Luque  11y ago

Remember the F40? 2.9 liter turbocharged V8. That was the second Ferrari to use forced induction. The first was the 288 GTO. .

No, Ferrari started to use forced induction from 1982 with a variant of the 308 just for italian market called 208 GTB turbo.


User avatar

Shaggy  11y ago

Remember the F40? 2.9 liter turbocharged V8. That was the second Ferrari to use forced induction. The first was the 288 GTO.


User avatar

V8Supercar1  11y ago

lol This is not the first time Ferrari has used forced induction.


User avatar

LDSLambo  11y ago

At least Lamborghini is still in the normal aspiration group.


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

@Saxy mayby i used too big words...430 is a realy good car. But for example 360 Modena for current standards is not that good and even is poor in comparison to the newest supercars.

And i would say that cars like Mp4, 997 Turbo S, 458 are that fast that they are and always will be fast because they have so high level of performance. They are fast because they are...0-200 kp/h in less than 10,5s always will be thrilling experience for 99,9% people.

360 Modena almost wasnt any step in good direction in comparison to 355...380 hp vs 400 ?

I m a fan of Ferrari but i dont realy like 360 Modena.

From the other side there are drivers who like 360 Modena more than 458 !


User avatar

saxy  11y ago

430 is laughable in comparison to 458.

Isn't that the same with every new replacement that's several years down the road?

The original Huayra is exactly 10 seconds faster than the first Zonda on the very short Top gear track. Guess the Zonda was terrible.


User avatar

PPG  11y ago

Is it not legislation that is messing up our beloved machines? Turbos everywhere now. Turbo M5,Turbo M3,Turbo Ferrari,Turbos in the coffee!


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

As long as you smoke a pipe while driving it, you'll be alright.

LOL ^This is all that needs to be said lol


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

430 is laughable in comparison to 458. In every aspect. 430 Scuderia is a different story...430 Scuderia is a great supercar - one of the best supercar ever made.

I cant wait for the successor of 458...whether it has turbo or n/a engine it will be for sure a sensatinal super with incredible level of performance...


User avatar

saxy  11y ago

When the 430 came out, it was nothing less of "real good performance"

Turbos are here to stay. With emission laws hitting hard, it's inevitable. But again, not like paddle shifters popular amongst ethusiasts, but they are practical. Turbos increase MPG, HP, and a lot of torque. From that point of view, it's hard for law makers to ever say no to that, but not like they know what's to be a petrol head


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

@Man1 458 was a significant event in development (F1 gearbox, very high quality, good comfort, at last realy good performance - that car is still one of the fastest car in the world - not counting hypercars obviously but it is different league....while for example 360 modena in it is time was barely faster than E39 M5...).


User avatar

fth  11y ago

The Cal was always the " country cousin" in the Ferrari range.


User avatar

PPG  11y ago

As long as you smoke a pipe while driving it, you'll be alright.


User avatar

man1  11y ago

"mile•stone (ˈmaɪlˌstoʊn)
n.
1. a stone functioning as a milepost.
2. a significant event or point in development. "


User avatar

man1  11y ago

Milestone ? After 3 decades ? You forgot about 3 great cars from Ferrari : 599 , 458 (true milestone) and F12 (epic).
which ones of these are turbo?


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

Great cars yes I agree, But Milestones I don't. Sure there all fantastic cars nobody can dispute that, Epic on F12 yes, 458 no, 599 definetly not, But I don't see the mile stone part, I certainly would not count a Scuderia as a milestone, Great cars, But I think the last "Possibly" milestone car for Ferrari, Maybe Enzo, Maybe F50, Not too sure, That word Milestone is a tough one.


User avatar

Piorun  11y ago

Is good engine a bad engine? Its now just only about ideology, tradition and purity. It have nothing to do with the technology beceause good Turbo is a good thing.

Similar story was with the paddle shifters and so on in history. We are moving forward.
Its not that crapy single turbos with turbo lag like 15 years ago.

Its fluid and responsive now.

The most importand thing now for me is how with the realiability of this thing. But if ok im fine.


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

599 is a very good car.

458 isnt a milestone ? It is an epic car even now after 5 years on market.

F12 mayby is not a milestone coze 458 is but F12 is one of the absolutly best sport car ever built.

Obviously i forgot about 430 Scuderia. Scuderia also is a great car.


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

Not sue id call any of those Milestones...Specially the 599


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

Milestone ? After 3 decades ? You forgot about 3 great cars from Ferrari : 599 , 458 (true milestone) and F12 (epic).