Log in / Register

 

 

10 months ago

Horsepower Wars

650hp for 54 thousand dollars. Just let that soak in for a minute. We live in a time where a consumer can walk into your nearby Ford dealership, sign some papers, and leave in a car with 650 SAE horsepower. The horsepower war is in full motion, and it just keeps getting better and better.

It got really interesting in the 80’s. In a time where everything was hum drum and slow, Porsche released a car that shocked the world… The 959, a 444hp all-wheel drive behemoth. It reset the rules and crushed everything in its path. But in doing so, it rustled the stall of the prancing stallion. Ferrari answered back with their unapologetically, absurdly powerful, 471hp F40. Ferrari continued to push their F hypercars, bumping their power up and up over time.

It seems that with every great car match-up, a horsepower war ensues. In 1990, Chevrolet’s ZR1 and Porsche’s 964 911 turbo were simultaneously released, and the General had the Porsche outgunned. With 375hp on tap, the ‘vette could outrun the 911’s 320hp air cooled flat 6. But Porsche wasn’t ready to leave things at that. Two years later, they released their Turbo S, with a ‘vette crushing 376hp. Yes, fantastic plastic, I see your power… and raise you one! Not to be outdone by one pony, Chevrolet bumped the power of the ZR1 the next year up to 405hp! It was a huge thing at the time. Over 400hp at a “reasonable” price! But that wasn’t the end of it for these two legends.

The early 2000’s were all Porsche. Their Turbo, Turbo S, and GT2 easily outmatched the Z06’s 405hp. When the 997 turbo rolled onto showroom floors, it packed 470hp. Chevrolet wasn’t impressed though, they pushed their LS engines to a new production limit and squeezed 505hp out of their 427ci LS7 “small block.” But it wasn’t enough for what Porsche had in mind; they released a new GT2, with 523hp. It was around this time that 500hp from a higher-end sports car was becoming the norm. Every big name had one – Ferrari, Ford, GM, Chrysler, BMW, Jaguar, Aston Martin, Porsche… Lamborghini had two! 500hp was really becoming commonplace.

The same can even be said of sedans. If you had a family sedan with not quite 300hp in the early 90’s, it was either as big as a land yacht, or more than I could afford at the time. But now offering over 300hp in a small car luxury car is basically a requirement to be truly competitive.

The examples are everywhere. BMW vs. Audi, Mustang vs. Camaro, Corvette vs. Porsche vs. Viper, Ferrari vs. Lamborghini. And with hyper cars, we were seeing competition in the 1000hp range for the super elite that wipe their bums with 100 dollar bills.

And it is far from over my friends. There are great things on the horizon. Lamborghini touched lucky number 7, and that pushed Ferrari over the same edge. The new corvette and 911 turbo are still in the works… Pony cars have north of 300, 400, 500, or 600hp, depending on how brave you are… and there’s a chance that 700hp (or at least 600hp) will be the new 400hp of the early 2000’s.

For those who are overly passionate about their favorite cars: The next time a car is updated and puts your favorite car to shame, don’t get angry… Get excited! It’s only going to lead to bigger and better things.

But will it ever end? As a tire burning, gear banging, car loving enthusiast… I pray the answer is no.

Community comments (31)

4 months ago
@br2
I don't think power outputs have gone crazy since 2009 it's losing momemtum. Engines will get smaller and cars will get lighter. In a few years or so they will not beat the cars of today in terms of power output. We are at the end game. No mainstream manufacturer will release a car with 700hp and RWD or 400hp and FWD.
4 months ago
@shaggy
Yeah progress is great. My dad remembers the days when many cars in the UK weren't even offered with diesel as an option and all cars had carbs, 8 valves and distributors. The only way you used to be able to get more power was to stick a huge engine under the bonnet (hood to US friends). The only cars in the 70s that were quick by modern standards were top of the range german saloons and exotic supercars. Now you just slap a little turbo and valve control onto a 2.0l and everyones a winner!
5 months ago
@ FastestLaps: Actually, the original Willys Jeep had 60 horsepower. Yes, the horsepower wars rage on, and it is a better automotive world for it, engine are getting more powerful and more fuel efficient, I am amazed that there are now normally aspirated V6s making 300+ horsepower, V8s in pick-up trucks making 300+ horsepower is commonplace, I remember when I first heard that the 2000 Chevrolet Silverado was available with a 6.0 liter Vortec V8 producing 300 horsepower, now, there are everyday pick-ups with 380, 390, even 400+ horsepower engines, these new trucks would laugh at a 2000 Silverado's 300 little 300 ponies. I have a 2008 Dodge Dakota SXT Extended Cab pick-up with a 3.7 liter, 226 cubic inch SOHC V6 making 210 horsepower, it's quick for what it is, but that's just the standard engine, the optional engine is a 4.7 liter, 287 cubic inch V8 making 302 horsepower, in a truck, with a small V8. The engine arms race is on in every venue from supercars, to pick-up trucks, to crossovers and minivans, ever thought you'd live to see the day a minivan had 300 horsepower, those days are coming soon, the Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Town and Country, Ram C/V, and Volkswagen Routan all have 283 horsepower from 3.6 liter V6s.
9 months ago
The horsepower wars have always been going on but in the late 80s turbocharging started becoming common and power outputs went up massively. Since then there was a drop off in power increases and from 1995-2005 frankly not much happened in terms of ultimate performance. Also average car weight has increased significantly and power outputs have increased to match this.
9 months ago
@Viking, I total agree with everything, However, ABout the ground clearance, they could always put a hydraulic lift life the do on the more extreme supercars, that way you could keep the low ride height while being able to raise and lower the car at will. but also adding that would add a bit of weight. not that i mind.

@Apathy, Im glad they did do that to the name of the ZL1, ZR1 should be for the Top Vette, and ZL1 should be for the Top Camaro, and other Z Monikers for the other Top car models.
9 months ago, last edited 9 months ago
@BR2

Unfortunately, the ZL1 name was actually bastardized away from the corvette and onto the camaro.

The original ZL1 was a name designated for the 1969 Corvette ZL1 which had a special 427. This hotter engine was code named the ZL1, which is what led to the corvette submodel being called the ZL1.

There was actually never an official Camaro ZL1 (debatable), though some purchased ZL1 crate engines through COPO and had them installed by dealers.
9 months ago
These new high horsepower engines sure have great power bands and rev ranges. On my favorite road (the Lake Berryessa pass) between Napa, and Fairfield California, I only need third and fourth gears. This is one of the best mountain roads that I have ever encountered, I highly recommend it to anyone visiting the wine country area. The pavement is great, and the curves are tight, and the scenery fantastic. Once again though, I can't use all 400 plus horsepower, the straights are way too short. A lighter car with less horsepower would probably do just as well.
9 months ago
In my opinion, what the C7 Corvette needs is more ground clearance. The air dam is too low, it scrapes crossing a street if the road has a crown to it. Maybe they could enclose the underside like Porsche does with the Boxster/Cayman models, and still maintain the CdA. I think the horsepower levels are fine where they are now. The fuel economy is fine as well, so I think they should keep big displacement engines.
9 months ago
@Super8

I doubt Chevrolet will use the ZL1 name in there Corvettes, not with the ZR1 name bought back, but who knows, i hope they keep the ZR1 for the To Corvette, and ZL1 for there To Camaro.

Im Hoping the New Corvette C7 will use a N/A 6.0L V8 for the base model engine, none of that 5.0L Crap, lighter engine and more Mpg is fine, but keep with the bigger motors(Tradition) Some of cars today are loosing there traditions because of this Bhp Wars stuff, I dont like that.

But i would like too see Chevrolet bring back more of there Traditional Oldies.

Chevrolet Nova SS (ZN1)
Chevrolet Chevelle SS (ZC1)
Chevrolet Impala SS (ZI1)
Chevrolet Corvair Monza (ZM1)

I would like to see these Chevrolet Models make a comeback with Top Z monikers as there Best. IMO American Cars are by far the best looking when it comes to "Retro" design.

But still, im sure they would over power the cars if they ever came to fruition...Back To a GentleMens AgreeMent?... -_-
9 months ago
@Super8

Corvette's have sporadically had aluminum heads since 1968...
They've been on every corvette engine since 1992.
9 months ago
@ BR2: Lol! I live in Japan you right! We Japanese will always create small engine and less power but it's always agile and fast. Have you ever heard? There's a rumor the new C7 Vette will get new special limited model that will be more powerful than ZR1. It will call.... ZL1. It rumored they'll remake it based on 1969 model and it will have aluminum head and power range is about 700 Hp. I guess some people will be create "Big and Stupid" car and the other will create "Small and Cleaver" car. We always be like that till the end of the world.....
9 months ago
Maybe the WORLD should have a GentleMens Agreement? No car over 300bhp?..

Given the current state, cars might drive them selves in 2025 with all electric engines and what not. i hear.

I think a Bhp war is stupid, next we will see in 2 years a 900bhp car you can get for 50k...but what gets me, is all the Electronics there putting in the cars, there less driver and more car, i certainly dont want that.

Less manuals, more 4wd cars, more expensive, more electronic niggles, I can see why Japan had that Agreement for so long, im not one for restricting Top Speed, but i thinkl alot of cars are getting too powerfull too soon, for instance.

Good examples:

638Bhp 2012 ZR1
505Bhp 2006 ZO6
405Bhp 2004 ZO6
405Bhp 1995 ZR1

570Bhp 2012 458
490Bhp 2008 430
400Bhp 2004 360
375Bhp 1997 355
300Bhp 1993 348

Like E, i would like to see cars get lighter rather then getting more Powerful, Powers fine, but i think a slower pace would be better in getting there, how long will it be till a Fully produced 1000Bhp AUto will be available to everyone?.....
9 months ago
I don't think the Hyundai 2.0 turbo is going to have reliability issues.

If I remember correctly, it was designed with Mitsubishi and uses the same block as the EVO X.

The same engine is used in the Kia Optima turbo.

It is a very cool engine but there are a couple of problems with it that I see.

1) They only mated it to an auto in the sedans (not the engine's fault)

2) Quite a few shops are still having trouble cracking the ECU on the older 2.0l's in the Genesis coupe.

@Fastestlaps
Well, it's almost as powerful as a two decade old 6.0l.
Even the weakest 6.0l GM put in their early trucks made 300hp.

Lots of makes have powerful 4 cylinders now. It's getting very interesting as numbers go up.

The new ATS turbo is going ot have over 270hp.

Hopefully manufacturers keep the weight down.
Supposedly the camaro is going to shed pounds with the next generation.
9 months ago

Honestly, there is no reason for a Wrangler to have more than 100 hp other than to please the crazy horsepower-loving buyer....



I don't think so, people some times claim that sporty cars are useless for driving on the road, but acceleration, braking, and cornering are only going to make the car safer when used correctly. I'd rather have 280 hp in a Jeep than 100 if I'm going to have to merge on to a highway.

I do wish that the obsession with horsepower could be moved to something else though, especially weight. I'd much prefer for cars to be lighter rather than more powerful.
9 months ago
In almost every case the difference in power between the predecessors and successors is huge, but I've found one comparison, which amazed me:

http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/chevrolet_corvette_coupe_62_c6-vs-chevrolet_corvette_stingray_l71.html

It happened not so, the difference is so little, although one of them is 40 years older than other!
9 months ago
Even a 180 hp car can make 0-160 acceleration better then before 20 years + around 300 hp car...
9 months ago
This thing about 300hp atleast is hugeley mistaken... Before when 300 hp was a lot most of the 300 hp cars wasnt fast as todays 300 hp.Today a 200 hp car good performance car can outake an old 300 hp one. So what i want to say is horses arent all .today the bigger war is in body and transsmision mostly
9 months ago
Today's innovation in engine efficiency is wasted by proportionally increasing power output that takes most of the efficiency away.

9 months ago, last edited 9 months ago
@monkey

Now we have V6 Wrangler with 280 hp!!!

How much HP did the original Jeep have? 50 perhaps?

Honestly, there is no reason for a Wrangler to have more than 100 hp other than to please the crazy horsepower-loving buyer....

Maybe we deserve global warning and subsequent apocalypse - it's interstellar natural selection that will kill us - irrational horsepower junkies....
10 months ago, last edited 10 months ago
Its not just cars.. its everything with wheels.

Back in 2002 I bought a nissan pickup with their "premium" V6 engine. It was slow as spit with a 5 speed manual and had a 3.3L V6 that only produced 170 horsepower. 0-60 was around 10 seconds.

Just 2 years later the same model truck was given a 4.0L V6 and 6 speed manual. The engine has VVt & variable intake and produces 270 horses. In spite of the truck being heavier it will run 0-60 in 6.5 seconds and gets better MPG than the previous less powerful engine option.

That is one hell of a jump in power/performance from one generation to the next. The difference between the two trucks is like night and day.

I usually drive my vehicles until they are completely dead but after driving the new model pickup I had to make a trade.
10 months ago
I do find it amazing how much horsepower is available for street driving. 300 horsepower used to be a lot 20 years ago. Now I have well over 400 hp in a car I only paid $35k U.S. dollars for, quite amazing. Ford sells 662 hp for $54k base, and $63k as tested. I am sure even more power is coming with this continuing horsepower war. It is hard to find places to exploit even 400 odd horsepower, but I do try.
10 months ago
And we have no idea on how long it's gonna last....

High boost, small displacement, cost cutting in manufacturing - that all suggests classic Hyundai - works well until the warranty runs out :D

Let's hope it's not the case. Remember - engineering has hone a long way. These are better designs made from better materials and we can't always judge today's engines by past experience.

10 months ago
I will be an imbecile, if this is not Theta 2.0 GDI turbo 286 bhp.
10 months ago
Nice engine but that consumption is too optimistic ;)
Pages:    12Next

Quick Vote

Does the new Porsche 911 Turbo has enough power?

Yes
No

6080 fastest lap times for 3571 cars from 264 manufacturers.
© Fastestlaps.com 2006-2013