Performance

Max speed 155 miles/h (250 km/h)
0-100 km/h 4.8 seconds
0-160 km/h 11.0 seconds
0-200 km/h 16.8 seconds
0-300 km/h -
Quarter mile 13.2 seconds
0-100-0 mph -

Engine

Power 252 kw (338 bhp / 343 ps)
Torque 365 Nm (270 lb-ft)
Displacement 3.2 liters
Engine type R6
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox 6 speed
Drive rear
Mass 1565 kilograms (3443 lbs)
Weight distribution 49.9 / 50.1
Year of introduction 2000
Home country Germany

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 216.17 hp/tonne
Power per liter 78.84 kw/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1357/1356, 0 points
Page views 36055
Car submitted by unknown

More M3 (E46) photos

Photo of BMW M3 (E46)Photo of BMW M3 (E46)

2000 BMW M3 (E46)

Photo of BMW M3 (E46)

Other cars by BMW (178)

M5 (E60), M3 CSL (E46), M6, 130i, 335i Coupe, Z4 M Roadster, M5 (E39), Z8, M3 (E30), M3 (E36), Z3 M Coupe, Z4 3.0i, E30 M3 Sport Evolutione, Z4 3.0si Coupe, 320i, 320si, Z3 3.0i, Z3 M Roadster, 120i, 318ti Compact, 325ti Compact, 330i, 528i, ... show more

Community comments (31)

4 months ago

florin
1 year ago
i have a m3 e46 and i liKE 0-100 in 4.8 and 0-200 in 16.8 but i think those are CSL specs
i think corect is 5.2 and 18.2
most optimistic owners are saying 5.0
please respond
thank you

I think this is correct, was there any response?
6 months ago
Best moddable car ever. Best sounding straight-piped exhaust, hands down apart from the VRA CGT. 1046rwhp with a simple $25k turbo kit and some new cams, intake and other stuff. It also looks superb when you lower it and put some 19's on. Definitely, IMO, best M3 ever.
9 months ago
That may be true, but like i said, ALOT of people, Whithin those 3 countrys will not know the difference, u have torque/Nm u have lbs/kg u have Kw/Bhp/Ps, but no 0-60mph/0-100kmh? and alot of people come from those nations who are on this site, thats why you should put them, also most care that are newly added always have the 0-60mph times added instead of the 0-100kmh time added, do you not go everyday without getting the 0-100kmh time mixed with the 0-60mph time? so if you have both metric And omperial times listed with the other stats you should put them in the performance stats as well.
9 months ago
the reason why we use metric system is simple..because there are only three nations in the world NOT using the metric system... one is the USA
9 months ago
IMO, the reason they probably don't use both is that it might cause more problems than it solves. For example suppose 1 European magazine gets 5.6 sec for 0-100kph then an American magazine gets 5.6 sec 0-60mph. Everyone will be like "WTF? How can they both be the same" (Different cars, different conditions, numerous other reasons)
9 months ago
But most people dont know that. thats why i say this site should have both metric and imperial datas. i mean they do on everything else, why not performance? well atleast 0-60mph times.
9 months ago
^0-60mph isn't the same as 0-100kph.

100kph=62.14mph (approx.)
9 months ago
WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE ON ABOUT... MY M3 E46 GOES 0-60 IN 4.6s. Try loosing some weight :)
1 year ago
i got mine to Sub Way
Got mine to sub 11
1 year ago
11.0 to 160kmh can be accurate, the fastest time i have seen has ben 11.3, but 11.0 is definetly possible.
1 year ago
I think 11sec 0-160 is a bit optomisitic guys...??

probably closer to 12 secs..
1 year ago
I have E55 W210 and i always beats this M3 after 165 km. The informtion here is either wrong for E55 or M3.
2 years ago
The Laguna Seca time was set with an E46 that is stated as having race tyres and 350bhp..... its a good time but not stock so I've deleted it.
2 years ago
How did this get such a good time at laguna seca faster than a current generation e92 m3.
2 years ago
how stupid are you?? your actually comparing a $53,000 333bhp NON track car to a 475bhp $193,000 PORSCHE track car, just how stupid are you..REALLY. and if you ahvent noticed BMW's CSL is only 4 SECONDS of the 996 GT2's time. and that only has 360bhp and still costing $73,000 LESS. so buddy, eat sht and stop wasting everybodys time with your dumbass comments, your starting to sound like Adam Eduardo Wood...and that AINT ad good thing!!!!!!!
2 years ago
this is not exactly what id call slow, especially for a 00 model. you obviously dont understand the difference between performance and other stuff that costs money. its like youre exppecting an m5 sedan to be as fast as a high-end porsche round a twisty track.
2 years ago
Just to show you how slow this car is compare the 997gt2 did 45 seconds faster on the ring than this car, bmw cars are definitly not track cars. So what are they good for???
2 years ago
no, csl specs are much faster, 0-60mph in 4.4- 0-100kph 4.8 for the csl and o-100mph 10.5-0-160kph 10.6. but it all depends on the driver!
2 years ago
i have a m3 e46 and i liKE 0-100 in 4.8 and 0-200 in 16.8 but i think those are CSL specs
i think corect is 5.2 and 18.2
most optimistic owners are saying 5.0
please respond
thank you
2 years ago
the Laguna Seca source claim race tires... and there are so many different M3 Laguna Seca laptimes?
3 years ago
Ok, i was confused because there's also an BMW engine that's named R6.
But i get the point haha.
Thanks for clearify.
3 years ago
In fastestlaps.com we don't have a seperate field for engine names/codenames. What we have is a field titled "Engine type" and "R6" is type of engine - not a name. R6 stands for 6 cylinders in a (R)ow or you can also call it "inline 6".
3 years ago
The 5,2 figure is right.
That's the official 0-100 time according to the books.
However the M3 engine name is not R6 but S54.
Pages:    12Next
4961 fastest lap times for 2571 cars from 218 manufacturers.
(c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010