| Heyhuub |
3 years ago |
| Is there a real source for that time except wikipedia?
As much as i like the car, without a real source this time will be deleted.
|
|
| Otreblax |
3 years ago |
 http://www.globalcar.com/datasheet/Bugatti/1992_Bugatti_EB110_Su
perSport.htm
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z143/Bugatti_EB110%20SS/defau
lt.aspx
|
|
| Otreblax |
3 years ago |
| Sorry, I Haven't....
Where i can found the real source?
|
|
| FastestLaps |
3 years ago |
 Try Google. That's all I can suggest. Even in Wikipedia there is "citation
needed" written next to this lap time.
|
|
| Anonymous |
2 years ago |
| its kinda hard to bilieve the new cts-v beat thin thing round the ring..lol butt
helly yeah gooo caddy..lol
|
|
| Anonymous |
2 years ago |
| is it possible to have more than 4 turbos? like say 7 or 10 or whatever? just
curious..lol and is it possible too have turbos and superchargers?
|
|
| FastestLaps |
2 years ago |
| Yes it is possible to have 10 turbos on a single engine. But I don't think it
could make any sense. And yes, it is possible to have both - turbo and
supercharger on a single engine. In fact there are mainstream cars with such
engines - like Golf GT 1.4TSI.
|
|
| FastestLaps |
2 years ago |
| 10 turbos wouldn't make sense because engine would become painfully complicated
and without any increase in power - since you can get the same power increase
with one massive turbine. Multiple turbos are used to reduced so called "turbo
lag". But 10 sounds like too much to be practical.
|
|
| Anonymous |
2 years ago |
| you never know with that japanese technology..lol
|
|
| rick |
2 years ago |
| i have a 7,47 EVO n52 page20 done with 2 people onboard with wet.
they say it can do a 7,30 in optimal conditions
|
|
| nismoGTR |
7 months ago |
| Uglyest and worst supercar ever
|
|
| FastestLaps |
7 months ago |
“Uglyest and worst supercar ever
” It may not be the best supercar but in my eyes it's not ugly. If
this is ugly then so is Lamborghini Countach and many classic hypercars.
|
|
| Georg |
7 months ago |
 good that a Ex F1 driver completely prove you wrong nismoGTR fanboy..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHwFpoIA84g
|
|
| Anonymous |
7 months ago |
| Well i dont believe this is Ugly, but im with ya On the Countac FL, thata thing
is Uglyyyyy.
|
|
| man1 |
5 months ago |
| this car and the eb110ss are the same car. besides, in here the technical
information are correct, mentioning that the home country is Italy back then
bugatti was owned and built by italians) whereas fastestlaps' eb110ss and gt
tech details are incorrectly reporting France as home country.
|
|
| Anonymous |
5 months ago |
| 3.3 0-100 and it had such a terrible ring time, what gives.
|
|
| BumRush |
5 months ago |
 This EB110 GT and EB110 GT-SS are not the same car lol, else they wouldnt have
put a SuperSport after it lol
|
|
| man1 |
5 months ago |
what you call "this" is the
1992 Bugatti EB 110 SuperSport
and not the eb110gt as you claim (can you read where you are commenting?). ss
indeed means super sport, although here in fastestlaps eb110ss and
eb110supersport are entered as different cars .
|
|
| Anonymous |
5 months ago |
| well one of them needs to be deleted.
|
|
| Georg |
5 months ago |
to end this..there were realy two version of the SS avaible..the one for the US
market was heavyer and had thanks to 8 !!!! catalysators slightly less
power...
I turned this into the US version... and ALL EB110 were AWD
|
|
| Georg |
5 months ago |
| there was even a 3. EB 110 SS version..after Bugatti went bankrup in 1995. Dauer
(the guy who had build the LeMans winning Dauer Porsche 962 LeMans) has bought
the remaining parts from Bugatti and finished a series a Dauer EB110 SS ... with
even more power and lower weight..
|
|
