Audi S4 (B8) specs

Faster S4 or S5 Sportback?

1/4 mile in 13 s.

0-60 mph 4.4 sec
1/4 mile 13 sec

0-40kph:1,4
0-60kph:2,3
0-80kph:3,4
0-100kph:4,7
0-120kph:6,6
0-140kph:8,6
0-100mph:11,2
0-180kph:14,3
0-200kph:18,3

resource:http://imageshack.us/f/805/ab5z.jpg/

Old s4 0-200 is 17.5s
How the new S4's 0-200 can be 18.7s??????

please correct that!

@Jeff B, 330Hp, 4s range 0-100kph, Hockenheim laptime as fast as Bentley Cotinental GT SuperSports, An S Badge Audi, Please, tell Me how this ISNT a Performance car? And the RS4 is JUST A HIGHER performance car.

@BR2 This isn't a performance car really, just a mid-level compact sports sedan. The RS4 is a performance car.

S4 is just very very good looking car. If someone likes the kitschy car for him to S4 will be boring.

I wonder what the Drivers back in the day that arent with us any more(Death) would think of the Performance cars these days? Would Henry Ford like the New Mustangs? Would Etorre Bugatti Like the Veyron? Would Enzo like the 458? Would August Horch like the S4? Are Performance cars losing there Spirit in the need to be faster?

@derb

I'd have to agree that these are very, very boring looking cars.

I understand the Principle of Performance cars just fine, but please, Enlighten me..

@BR2

" but for what it can do, it looks incredibly boring"

i think you haven't understand the principle

Is it just me, or do all these Audis and Bmw just look the same? i like the S4, but for what it can do, it looks incredibly boring, and im a bit dissapointed at the new RS4 too:(

well, slower than the megane

Weight: 1788 kg
0-100 km/h: 4,9 s
0-200 km/h: 18,7 s
Quarter mile: 13,24 s
s1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/AutoBild%20Sportscars%20-%20Scans%202012/ABSC052012%20-%20S4%20vs%20335i%20vs%20C350%20vs%20CC%20FSI/?action=view&current=autobild_sportscars_-_audi_s4_vs_bmw_335i__mercedes-benz_c350__vw_cc_fsi6.jpg

I have added a lot of performance fitures for new S4. But why are they not accepted? Source from Autobild Sportcar 05/2012. Comarison between S4, 335i,C350 and passat cc 3.6.

weight is wrong..
corrected it..

The pre facelift model was avaible as stick shift and DSG model..the stick shift was always lighter... the pre facelift DSG version 1685kg

So it has the same hp and it weighs 100 kgs more than the B8?
Btw, maybe we should put B9 in the name.

@Apathy IMO too.

I've always preferred the looks of the C5 over the E39. Particularly the RS6 style. Not a fan of the E39's profile and how the hood slopes down and I think the A6's interior is just a million times better. JMO

Works for me...

Thats right, I meant the A6. I'd rather have a 5 series from that period but thats just me.

The C5 is the A6 actually.
And I think it looks pretty badass if you have the V8 flared arches. An RS6 front bumper would help too.

That's the plan as it looks right now anyway.

Meh I couldn't drive a C5 S4, it's just the most dulling looking, uninspired looking performance car, it's crazy how Audi has gone from that car to this, or ugly to beautiful imo.

I wish it was turbocharged.

I miss the old 2.7t so much that I might pick one up in a C5 body as a daily driver.

Yeah you're right actually, just looked on Audi site, sorry that 3.0T threw me off.

The audi.de claims it is supercharged.

V6-Zylinder-Ottomotor mit Benzindirekteinspritzung und mechanischem Auflademodul

It's turbocharged, and it looks different, so I added it, the S4 has had the same power for awhile now lol, like almost a decade.

Why it was added? The power and the torque remained the same. The engine supercharged not turbo.