Image of Cadillac ATS-V Coupe

Cadillac ATS-V Coupe specs

Price in Europe €72,500 - €88,800
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1636-1743 kg (3607-3843 lbs)
Dimensions 4.65 m (183 in) long, 1.81 m (71 in) wide, 1.41 m (55 in) high
Wheelbase 2.78 m (109 in)
Introduced 2016
Origin country United States
Gas mileage 16.3-13.1 l/100 km (14-18 mpg US / 17-22 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 320 g/km
Views 23.6k
Submitted by BR2+

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.5 s
0 - 50 kph1.8 s
0 - 100 kph4.0 s
0 - 130 kph6.2 s
0 - 160 kph8.9 s
0 - 200 kph14.0 s
0 - 40 mph2.2 s
0 - 60 mph3.8 s
0 - 80 mph6.1 s
0 - 100 mph8.4 s
0 - 150 mph19.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.6 s @ 98.2 mph
1/4 mile12.1 s @ 122.4 mph
Cadillac ATS-V Coupe acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed304 kph (189 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 012.9 s @ 912 ft
Est. max acceleration0.73 g (7 m/s²)
18m slalom69.9 kph (43.4 mph)
100 kph - 033 m (107 ft)
200 kph - 0136 m (446 ft)
70 mph - 047 m (154 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type TwinTurbo GM LF4 V6
Displacement 3.6 l (220 ci)
Power 470 ps (464 bhp / 346 kw) @ 5700 rpm
Torque 603 Nm (445 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm
Power / liter 131 ps (129 hp)
Power / weight 276 ps (272 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 354 Nm (261 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 32 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 30 ps
Transmission 6-Speed Manual/8-Speed Automatic
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)3.0 s
60 - 100 kph (5)4.3 s
80 - 120 kph (4)3.3 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.1 s
80 - 120 kph (6)5.7 s
80 - 120 kph (7)8.1 s
80 - 120 kph (8)14.7 s
80 - 160 kph (4)7.4 s
80 - 160 kph (5)9.4 s
80 - 160 kph (6)12.5 s
80 - 160 kph (7)16.1 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph10.3 s
User avatar
User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  4y ago

SportAuto (8/2017):
0-60 kph: 2.3 s
0-80 kph: 3.3 s
0-120 kph: 5.8 s
0-140 kph: 7.5 s
0-180 kph: 12.1 s


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  7y ago

Please delete the 0-100 mph and 0-150 mph datas, they are done by the sedan version!


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  8y ago

The sedan version has 464 HP and I don't think GM would make the coupé and the sedan version have different power figures.


User avatar

FastestLaps  8y ago

Wikipedia authors sometimes don't know the difference between metric horsepower and imperial. That 464 could be PS, not HP.

But I will applaud the fact that use of "PS" and metric horsepower has become mainstream across all types of media (online and offline). This wasn't the case 5-7 years ago. FL was one of the pioneers of using the PS and metric as primary acronym and unit for horsepower.



User avatar

uptownfunker  9y ago

I think the 1/8-mile est. came from the original (coupe) results "fakefillerfour" spreaded 4 months ago; but I did notice the estimates for the Ferrari Enzo was slightly changed a month ago, and the 599 GTB had its 1/8 est. trap down from 105 to 103, while retaining the 7.7s number.


User avatar

uptownfunker  9y ago

Nvm, the 12.1@122 # is for the Sedan model. :(


User avatar

uptownfunker  9y ago

If this was doing 0-60 in 3.9 and 0-100 in 8.4 (C&D #'s), it would have to do the 1/8-mile in 7.9-8.5 seconds at 96-101 mph, especially with the 1/4 being 12.1@122.


User avatar

FastestLaps  9y ago

Because estimates are not often re-calculated (hardly ever are).


User avatar

uptownfunker  9y ago

Why does the 1/8-mile estimate still show 8.2@90 if this one did 8.4 to 100? lol

Everyone knows it's not possible to go from 90-100 in 0.2 seconds unless you had a funnycar or top fuel dragster.


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

Some pretty amazing results.

3800lbs, Single clutch and rwd and for 61k Usd, A trap speed the same as an M5?...That is impressive.

Saloon version

https://fastestlaps.com/models/cadillac-ats-v-coupe


User avatar

fakekillerfour  10y ago

New C&D instrumented test:
(http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2016-cadillac-ats-v-coupe-test-review)

Zero to 60 mph: 4.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.9 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 13.7 sec
Standing 1/4-mile: 12.6 sec @ 115 mph



User avatar

V8Supercar1  10y ago

ATS-V on the track! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEd56ToLoNI


User avatar

lamboboy  10y ago

I expected this to be lighter.


User avatar

Flabernat  10y ago

Haha BR2+, I forgot you hate the look of the CTS coupe.
I agree that the M4 would probably we quicker in shear acceleration, but Cadillac has been good on delivering recently. Track performance is going to be VERY interesting...


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

Yeah looks great, 4 door looks good to, Atleast they didnt fk the coupe up like they did with the CTS, I still think this car is about 12 inches too long, But looks great, But it wont out accelerate the M4, Im almost 100% certain, On track however it just might, Dunno though, Very good chance of it though.


User avatar

Flabernat  10y ago

Yeah it's a good looking coupe, the sedan looks great as well... I'm dying to see if it can out-perform the new M3/M4. See if it can take after it's older brother CTS-V :)


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

I "Think" i might rather have a V8, But that is what the CTS is for, For this car im not too picky about it, Its nice to see a high powered 6 cylinder car. Although i would have gave it round 500Bhp or so, To match the 'True" Bhp number of its main rival the M4. But nontheless it looks fantastic inside and out, Cant wait for tests.


User avatar

Shaggy  10y ago

I think the car would be quicker with a normally aspirated V8 with the same horsepower.


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

Put Coupe after the name-_-