Image of Dodge Intrepid R/T

Dodge Intrepid R/T specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1616 kg (3563 lbs)
Dimensions 4.99 m (196 in) long, 1.83 m (72 in) wide, 1.37 m (54 in) high
Wheelbase 2.77 m (109 in)
Introduced 2002
Origin country United States
Views 6.4k
Submitted by aaaa

Powertrain specs

Engine type V6
Displacement 3.5 l (215 ci / 3523 cc)
Power 245 ps (242 bhp / 180 kw) @ 6400 rpm
Torque 336 Nm (248 lb-ft) @ 3950 rpm
Power / liter 70 ps (69 hp)
Power / weight 152 ps (150 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 208 Nm (153 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 4 speed auto
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive
User avatar
User avatar

Btscarre1  10y ago

R/T=halo brand at the time. Now, SRT takes over with R/T=mid-halo.


User avatar

FourFiveEight  11y ago

The Dodge Intrepid is not front wheel drive, it's rear wheel drive. aaaa should be right. Dodge (and Chrysler with its Concorde, LHS, and 300M) wanted people to know that those kind of cars are front wheel drive, but when we tested one of those Intrepids, it is rear wheel drive. Look at its suspension and engine position.

 

User avatar

SLN  3y ago

lmfao no they arent dude. Theyre FWD...that would take so much more work than you could imagine. The RT was nothing more than 2hp extra and slightly better throttle response and badges THATS IT!!!


User avatar

benedekpuskas  3y ago

You can tell it's fwd just by looking at the car's proportions...


User avatar

Banned  11y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

Im not sure there were many, if any American Saloon cars in 2000 that I even liked(Atleast I cant think at the moment) I don't hate any car, or even really dislike, but some I just rather have over others, Atleast in 2000, Cars weren't jizzed to the trumpet with every electronic aid imaginable, or the pressure of performance didn't hit the companys, Some REAL Raw cars were In that era. Kind of miss it.


User avatar

Flabernat  11y ago

Yeah, 90's - 2000 were rough for US cars. That said, I think in general cars weren't all that spectacular in that time frame.... Well except for the McLaren F1 ^_^


User avatar

Shaggy  11y ago

@ aaaa: Haha, I like it. ;)
@ BR2+: The early 2000s were a crappy time for American car companies.


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

...Not sure id call this fast, even for 11 years ago...


User avatar

aaaa  11y ago

0-60 in 7.8 seconds and 0.81g's on the skidpad, one of the fastest and best handling midsize family sedans at the time