What is the oil capacity for the 6.1 SRT-8 2006?
Dodge Magnum srt8 specs
| Price in US | $37,995 - $42,945 |
| Car type | Estate/wagon |
| Curb weight | 1986-1990 kg (4378-4387 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.84 m (191 in) long, 1.82 m (71 in) wide, 1.42 m (56 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.94 m (116 in) |
| Introduced | 2008 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Views | 11.6k |
| Submitted by | aaaa |
Lap times
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Motortrend Figure-8 | 0:26.10 |
Performance
| 5 - 60 mph | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 5.1 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 12.1 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 22.2 s |
| 1/4 mile | 13.6 s @ 106.0 mph |
| Top speed | 273 kph (170 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.87 g (9 m/s²) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 52 m (170 ft) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | HEMI V8 |
| Displacement | 6.1 l (370 ci / 6063 cc) |
| Power | 431 ps (425 bhp / 317 kw) |
| Torque | 569 Nm (420 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 71 ps (70 hp) |
| Power / weight | 217 ps (214 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 286 Nm (211 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 5 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Magnum srt8 competition
FastestLaps 1m ago
Ideally you want to find owners manual (pdf or physical book) and all fluid capacities will be listed there.
There are specific websites that list oil capacity for all cars, but I would not trust them, unless I can't find the actual owner's manual or service manual, or a document at vehicle manufacturer's website.
It is worth checking out your model specific forums where this question is no doubt asked before. If more than one user gives the same capacity number, I would trust that too.
Winter_in_Vegas 2y ago
My rt/awd will do the same as the srt8. A slightly cheaper and better upgrade. Handles better than the rwd8. And keeps up just the same. ;)
hostboy 2y ago
Dream on, MoPar fanboy... 4wd systems in the 2000s and earlier were pathetic back then (due to weight and significantly higher drivetrain losses), especially compared to rwd... most awd systems had a 25% drivetrain loss after adjusting for wheel power, or 1/0.80, and 4x4 trucks (a form of "awd") even had a 33% loss, or 1/0.75.
From my experience with mag, dyno, quarter-mile and handling tests, front-engine rwd cars have a 17% drivetrain loss, or 1/0.85... a modern-day front-mid, rear-mid, or rear-engine car* should have an 11% drivetrain loss, or 1/0.90.
*(peak Viper ZB2 SRT-10, 911 997.1 GT2, Corvette C6 ZR1, Gallardo LP560, 458 Italia) - basically, peak years for most supercars were between 2007 and 2009
It wasn't until the growth of turbocharged Quattros, xDrives and 4Matics that AWDs started to rise in mechanical efficiency. As I have stated, 85% efficiency is not really 15% loss, but rather 17% loss because efficiency is the dividing factor used after wheel power (whp / 0.85), while drivetrain loss is the multiplying factor (whp + 17%), both of which will result in approximately the same figure.
FastestLaps 14y ago
What do you mean by "it's about time the site let me add this car"?
Nothing has changed in site's terms of use.
