@ Mental: blargh! LMBO XD. I've never seen a Nissan Micra, we don't have them here in America, but some subcompact cars from the 90s look pretty pathetic, like Geo Metro.
Ford Puma 1.6 (Mk I) specs
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1035 kg (2282 lbs) |
Dimensions | 3.98 m (157 in) long, 1.67 m (66 in) wide, 1.34 m (53 in) high |
Introduced | 2000 |
Origin country | Germany |
Views | 7.3k |
Performance
0 - 60 mph | 10.1 s |
Top speed | 190 kph (118 mph) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | 4 cylinders 16 valves |
Displacement | 1.6 l (98 ci) |
Power | 103 ps (102 bhp / 76 kw) @ 6000 rpm |
Torque | 145 Nm (107 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm |
Power / liter | 64 ps (63 hp) |
Power / weight | 100 ps (98 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 140 Nm (103 lb-ft) / t |
Transmission | manual |
Layout | front engine, front wheel drive |
Mental 12y ago
Yeah, this car feels even more handsome comparing it to its rivals from 90-ties like Nissan Micra... blargh!
And that Cougar is also a pretty one comparing to its rivals, however, its predecessors were sexier and more furious vehicles:
https://fastestlaps.com/models/mercury-cougar-eliminator-429-boss
Yeah, baby!
FastestLaps 12y ago
I also liked this:
https://fastestlaps.com/models/ford-cougar-2-5i
Form the same era and from the same old car magazines :D
FastestLaps 12y ago
It's a handsome little car. I have always liked Ford Puma. At least from the outside and from pictures in car magazines.
I think it's a pretty car.
Might be horrible in terms of build quality and materials in the inside and overall quality (it's a late 90s / early 2000s Ford), but as far as prettiness, it's a stand out car of it's time.
heavy industries 12y ago
Specs:
0-100kmp 10,1
top speed 190 kmh
.parkers.co.uk/cars/reviews/facts-and-figures/ford/puma/coupe-1997/20151/