Image of Shelby GT500 Super Snake

Shelby GT500 Super Snake specs

Price in US $84,390
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1788-1790 kg (3942-3946 lbs)
Introduced 2010
Origin country United States
Views 30.2k
Submitted by phavyarden

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph4.2 s
0 - 30 mph1.7 s
0 - 40 mph2.6 s
0 - 50 mph3.3 s
0 - 60 mph3.9 s
0 - 70 mph5.0 s
0 - 80 mph6.0 s
0 - 90 mph7.0 s
0 - 100 mph8.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.1 s @ 98.8 mph
1/4 mile11.2 s @ 128.0 mph
Lateral acceleration0.92 g (9 m/s²)
60 mph - 035 m (114 ft)
Shelby GT500 Super Snake acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type Supercharged 90-deg V-8, alum block/ heads
Displacement 5.4 l (330 ci)
Power 644 ps (635 bhp / 474 kw)
Torque 788 Nm (581 lb-ft)
Power / liter 119 ps (118 hp)
Power / weight 360 ps (355 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 440 Nm (325 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6-speed manual
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

GTR35  1m ago

 

The Legendary Ford GT500 Super Snake.


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2y ago

@fastestlaps please change the power to 635 hp and the torque to 581 lbft


User avatar

Fangio Man  12y ago

@Piorun
What is it's actual fuel capacity?


User avatar

Super8  12y ago

There's a stupid guy who said Super Snake is a tuning car. Did they never read history or what? But I truly remember, the first Mustang hit over 170 mph is 67 GT500 Super Snake. It was done on Goodyear test track.


User avatar

Super8  12y ago

There's a stupid guy who said Super Snake is a tuning car. Did they never read history or what? But I truly remember, the first Mustang hit over 170 mph is 67 GT500 Super Snake. It was done on Goodyear test track.


User avatar

Piorun  12y ago

Should have bigger gas tank


User avatar

Anonymous...  12y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Viking  13y ago

@phavyarden Carroll Shelby is at it again, he has worked with his team to develop the Shelby Mustang 1000. It will come in street and track only versions. Once we have good info you should add it, or I might get around to it.


User avatar

x  14y ago

This cars not made for the drag strip, put it on a race track where it belongs and you'll see some real numbers


User avatar

ken  14y ago

They now make a 900 h.p. package. not sure about the track times but its a beast. Guys at Shelby say theres a 1000hp in the future that carroll wants to break speed records in!


User avatar

driver  14y ago

This car is heavily overster in corners but when it goes to the straight line it may become a monster. I heard it can run over 200 mph if set te gear ratio's


User avatar

monkeypop  14y ago

I watched a show on HDtheater about this car. I was amazed at how much is changed out in this car. They install a whole new suspension that looks like it should handle on rails.. although I believe its for drag racing.

This car should produce amazing numbers.. but for 750 horses it really isnt that impressive. Even on street tires it should muster a much better 0-60 time. I wonder why with all the parts upgraded.. this car doesnt post better numbers?


User avatar

Monkfg  14y ago

This is so backwards. High weight, high power, shit handling. True muscle car.


User avatar

Apathy  15y ago

A live axle is far from great, but tuners like Roush have actually managed phenomenal lateral grip numbers on the skid pad. I'd like to see an IRS, but it is possible to make a live axle handle very well. The daily drivability will suck though; the ride will be rough as all hell.


User avatar

The Stig  15y ago

Come on Shelby get ride of the live axle. Your cars can be so much better in everyway.


User avatar

Anonymous  15y ago

That time wasnt done by the 750bhp, it was done by th 635bhp, dont be stupid to think thats as fast as it can get, give it to Jaime Furman or JR, and you will see it be ALOT faster!


User avatar

ky  15y ago

If this is their promotional material, and their best driver, then maybe they should get out of cars----golf buggies maybe?----750bhp??????? I don't think so!


User avatar

Anonymous  15y ago

You people are incredibly stupid, its all in the driver. different drivers will make different times, do you really honestly think thats the best it can do? if so, get out of cars immeditly!!


User avatar

anonymous  15y ago

c'mon the GT500kr with 533 bhp is faster. MAKE BETTER CARS SHELBY!!


User avatar

anonymous  15y ago

Are you $h!tt!ng me 750 hp and 713 ftlb of torque, and this car can't do 0-60 in less than 4 secs and it's 1/4 mile mile time is still in the 12 second bracket. THIS CAR SUCKS!


User avatar

500kr  16y ago

sweet..............!


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

Man if they could have had the same weight as the 1990 version this sucker would be fast..er...


User avatar

BumRush  16y ago

I (Think) i like the old one better, but that damn wheelspin still makes it perform not as good as it could. and adding alot more power doesnt help it either, does this come with optional sets of tyres?


User avatar

LJUTICA  16y ago

I admire the numbers (HP,torque),I really do,but numbers don't make a sports car,or necessarily a fast car.
This car's power would make some other car really fly,for instance if that car has been made by Lotus,it would be even greater blast than it already is.And I know that it is.


User avatar

FastestLaps  16y ago

750 hp ? Wow!


User avatar

Georg  16y ago

weight corrected


User avatar

BumRush  16y ago

Given this has a proper driver Like Jaime Furman or Jeff Ranger, those stats are bested by the Slightly older 605bhp model i added. but put them in this car and this will easyly do 10's.


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

shit, i commited an horrible mistajke in the weight, must be corrected right now

LMAO!

3944kg and 4.2sec 0-100kph would be great!


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

With all that power and a high 4.2 to 100km i thought the weight must be correct , lol. Just joking but PDK in this car would have been pretty cool.


User avatar

phavyarden  16y ago

shit, i commited an horrible mistajke in the weight, must be corrected right now