BMW M5 vs Cadillac CTS-V vs Audi RS6 Avant Performance vs Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG S 4Matic+
| Category | BMW M5 | CTS-V | RS6 Avant | E 63 AMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps) | 560 | 649 | 605 | 612 |
| Max torque (Nm) | 680 | 855 | 700 | 850 |
| Curb weight (kg) | 1917 | 1885 | 2020 | 2051 |
| Power / tonne (ps) | 292 | 344 | 300 | 298 |
| Average price (€) | 105k | 101k | 127k | 133k |
Lap Times
| Track | BMW M5 | CTS-V | RS6 Avant | E 63 AMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachsenring | 1:38.90 | 1:36.45 | 1:38.47 | 1:35.90 |
| Autozeitung test track | 1:39.80 | 1:40.50 | 1:38.20 | 1:39.90 |
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | BMW M5 | CTS-V | RS6 Avant | E 63 AMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.4 s | 1.5 s | 1.3 s | 1.1 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.9 s | 1.7 s | 1.4 s | 1.3 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.9 s | 3.7 s | 3.4 s | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 5.8 s | 5.6 s | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 8.1 s | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 11.7 s | 10.9 s | 11.3 s | 10.4 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | 8.8 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s | 8.4 s | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
| 1/4 mile | 11.9 s | 11.6 s | 11.4 s | 11.1 s |
General performance
| Category | BMW M5 | CTS-V | RS6 Avant | E 63 AMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 306 kph | 324 kph | 305 kph | 300 kph |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.75 g | 0.74 g | 0.89 g | 0.90 g |
| 18m slalom | 65.7 kph | 69.6 kph | 66.8 kph | 69.0 kph |
| Fuel economy | 9.6 l/100 km | 14.5 l/100 km | 7.4 l/100 km | 9.7 l/100 km |
| 100 kph - 0 | 35 m | 33 m | 34 m | 33 m |
Summary
| Category | BMW M5 | CTS-V | RS6 Avant | E 63 AMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 96 | 98 | 99 | 100 |
| Straight line speed | 78 | 88 | 92 | 100 |
| Overall | 89 | 94 | 96 | 100 |
Verdict
E 63 AMG S 4Matic+ is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.5k times.
Acceleration graph
