I think x6 is considerably more beautiful than the Cayenne
BMW X6 M vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Category | BMW X6 M | Cayenne Turbo |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 4.4 l V8 | 4.8 l V8 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 555 / 547 | 500 / 493 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 680 / 502 | 700 / 516 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 2312 / 5097 | 2275 / 5016 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 240 / 237 | 220 / 217 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | BMW X6 M | Cayenne Turbo |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s | 1.3 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.4 s | 3.5 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s | 4.3 s |
0 - 160 kph | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
0 - 180 kph | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
0 - 200 kph | 16.3 s | 14.9 s |
1000 m | 23.3 s | 23.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.0 s | 11.3 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0 - 100 mph | 10.2 s | 9.4 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.0 s @ 95.1 mph | 8.9 s @ 95.7 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.5 s @ 111.2 mph | 12.4 s @ 113.1 mph |
General performance
Category | BMW X6 M | Cayenne Turbo |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 275 kph (171 mph) | 278 kph (173 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) | 0.68 g (7 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 62.9 kph (39.1 mph) | 66.5 kph (41.3 mph) |
Fuel economy | 13.9 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 20 UK) | 15.7 l/100 km (15 mpg US / 18 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 38 m (123 ft) | 34 m (113 ft) |
Summary
Category | BMW X6 M | Cayenne Turbo |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 194 | 200 |
Straight line speed | 1662 | 1745 |
Total | 1856 | 1945 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 3.9k times.
Acceleration graph
Fangio Man 12y ago
That is as expected but I would take the X6 though. IMO, it is the better looking car.