@ Aaron what were you saying about the Huracan getting slayed by the Corvette on track? Hmm the only thing getting slayed here is the Corvette it would appear lol
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 vs Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Huracan LP 610-4 |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 6.2 l V8 | 5.2 l V10 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 647 / 638 | 610 / 602 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 819 / 604 | 560 / 413 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1526 / 3364 | 1547 / 3411 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 424 / 418 | 394 / 389 |
Average price | €136,000 | €209,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration (mph)
Speed & distance | Corvette ZR1 | Huracan LP 610-4 |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 mph | 2.0 s | 1.5 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.3 s | 2.4 s |
0 - 70 mph | 4.1 s | 3.1 s |
0 - 80 mph | 4.9 s | 3.9 s |
0 - 90 mph | 5.8 s | 4.7 s |
0 - 100 mph | 6.9 s | 5.6 s |
0 - 110 mph | 8.1 s | 6.8 s |
0 - 120 mph | 9.5 s | 8.1 s |
0 - 130 mph | 11.1 s | 9.5 s |
0 - 140 mph | 13.0 s | 11.2 s |
0 - 150 mph | 15.8 s | 13.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 7.9 s @ 105.0 mph | 7.3 s @ 110.0 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.2 s @ 130.5 mph | 10.3 s @ 135.0 mph |
Est. 1/2 mile | 18.5 s @ 157.8 mph | 17.5 s @ 163.4 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
Speed & distance | Corvette ZR1 | Huracan LP 610-4 |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.5 s | 1.0 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.6 s | 1.1 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.4 s | 1.5 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.1 s | 2.0 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.2 s | 2.8 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.0 s | 3.6 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.0 s | 3.9 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.1 s | 4.6 s |
0 - 160 kph | 6.9 s | 5.8 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.2 s | 6.4 s |
0 - 200 kph | 10.3 s | 9.0 s |
0 - 250 kph | 17.4 s | 15.3 s |
0 - 300 kph | 27.6 s | 27.6 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.7 s | 1.9 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.2 s | 6.4 s |
Est. 200 - 300 kph | 21.9 s | 18.4 s |
General performance
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Huracan LP 610-4 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 334 kph (208 mph) | 328 kph (204 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.85 g (8 m/s²) | 1.08 g (11 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 72.3 kph (44.9 mph) | 72.8 kph (45.2 mph) |
36m slalom | 140.0 kph (87.0 mph) | 142.0 kph (88.2 mph) |
Fuel economy | 16.4 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 17 UK) | 6.5 l/100 km (36 mpg US / 43 UK) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.10 g (11 m/s²) | 1.02 g (10 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) | 30 m (100 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 43 m (142 ft) | 44 m (144 ft) |
Summary
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Huracan LP 610-4 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 554 | 595 |
Straight line speed | 2756 | 4098 |
Total | 3311 | 4692 |
Verdict
Huracan LP 610-4 is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 3.9k times.
Acceleration graph
AhmadGalal 4y ago
This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.
racerns 10y ago
Yet again you guys are missing the point of my orginal comment. It was more of a comment on how the site was determining which car was faster than which car is actually faster.
By the way, saxy, it did not take years and thousands of runs to get the 10.7 time (by the way the best stock time is actually 10.66). My first time ever at the drag strip with the ZR1 I came away with a best of 11.05. The next time I went to the strip I ran the 10.85 @130. It took me ~20 runs total (from both days) before I did that time. I did a track rental with 4 other ZR1s one day and every ZR1 has a time in the 10s that day.
Flabernat 10y ago
This guy is obviously better than your average magazine journalist, but here it is, stock everything(even tires)...
C6 ZR1 10.74 @ 133mph
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woOqqfGtqHo
saxy 10y ago
Well that's because there aren't enough laps to compare to. And considering how monstrous the huracan has been over the Porsche gt2 rs, which is shown to be faster than the zr1. So I have no doubt the huracan is no slower than the zr1 on track.
U say you've witnessed that 10.7 run yet every car magazine test puts it 10.9-11.3s. Then that means 10.7 is quite a fluke from simply years of thousands of runs on super sticky drag strips. The huracan which is only a few months old has set times between 10.4-10.7 consistently. So we can probably expect a 10.2/10.3 in the near future. So still the huracan is faster
racerns 10y ago
@saxy: I personally witnessed the 10.7 run and the car was 100% on stock PS2 tires. No race gas was used and even if it had been there would be no performance gain unless the car had been modified. Putting race gas in a stock car gains you nothing. I have personally run a 10.85 in my stock ZR1.
But the point of my comment was not really on which car is really faster but more on the weight that fastestlaps was giving to the performance figures. The name of this site is fastestlaps, yet the car with the faster lap time, higher listed top speed, and equal 1/4 mile time was determined to be the slower car by the site algorithm.
saxy 10y ago
The 1/4 mile time is bogus set on race fuel and questionable legality. The ZR1 is more a 11.0s car hence why the other acceleration numbers are so off that pace. The huracan however actually is faster than a 10.7 car. It's a 10.4s car and therefore much faster. It's faster from 0-100kph. It's also a lot faster from 100-300 kph straight line it wins hands down convincingly the top speed of the lambo is also higher. Lambo said the top speed is 202+mph not exactly 202. If it were only 202 the 200-300kph time will be much slower due to the drag coming in. Given how the lambo is still pulling away the zr1 even faster at higher speed, its top speed must also be higher than the zr1