The vette bested the Lambo on the track despite costing a fraction of the Lambo, and its straight line performances are somewhat similar. The Vette takes this one for me, even if the Murcielago looks hotter
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 vs Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 6.2 l V8 | 6.5 l V12 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 647 / 638 | 670 / 661 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 819 / 604 | 660 / 487 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1526 / 3364 | 1664 / 3668 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 424 / 418 | 403 / 397 |
Average price | €136,000 | €357,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration (mph)
Speed & distance | Corvette ZR1 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s | 1.6 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
0 - 50 mph | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.3 s | 2.8 s |
0 - 70 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0 - 80 mph | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0 - 90 mph | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0 - 100 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0 - 110 mph | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
0 - 120 mph | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
0 - 130 mph | 11.1 s | 11.5 s |
0 - 140 mph | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
0 - 150 mph | 15.8 s | 15.4 s |
0 - 160 mph | 18.9 s | 18.2 s |
0 - 170 mph | 23.1 s | 21.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 7.9 s @ 105.0 mph | 7.5 s @ 107.5 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.2 s @ 130.5 mph | 10.9 s |
Est. 1/2 mile | 18.5 s @ 157.8 mph | 18.0 s @ 160.3 mph |
Est. 1 mile | 29.5 s @ 181.4 mph | 28.6 s @ 184.5 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
Speed & distance | Corvette ZR1 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.5 s | 1.2 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.6 s | 1.4 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.4 s | 1.9 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.1 s | 2.0 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.2 s | 3.0 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.0 s | 4.3 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.0 s | 4.8 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.1 s | 5.3 s |
0 - 160 kph | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.2 s | 8.0 s |
0 - 200 kph | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
0 - 300 kph | 27.6 s | 29.7 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.4 s | 6.2 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.7 s | 2.3 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
Est. 200 - 300 kph | 21.9 s | 19.6 s |
General performance
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 334 kph (208 mph) | 342 kph (213 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.85 g (8 m/s²) | 0.99 g (10 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 72.3 kph (44.9 mph) | 70.1 kph (43.6 mph) |
36m slalom | 140.0 kph (87.0 mph) | 136.0 kph (84.5 mph) |
Fuel economy | 16.4 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 17 UK) | 18.1 l/100 km (13 mpg US / 16 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) | 33 m (110 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 28 m (91 ft) | 30 m (98 ft) |
Summary
Category | Corvette ZR1 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 693 | 654 |
Straight line speed | 3804 | 4096 |
Total | 4497 | 4750 |
Verdict
Murcielago LP 670-4 SV is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 3.1k times.
Acceleration graph
AhmadGalal 4y ago
LOL the C6 ZR1 is pathetic. 3 entire seconds slower to 300 k m h than a Murcielago SV while being lighter, having more torque and less downforce than SV! On-paper stats mean nothing then!!
BR2, 13y ago
...With a Name like that, we all know which one you would pick..Im pretty much the opposite, I can afford a ZR1, but i would not pick one simply because i do not need it, and the Price here has gon up Substantially, But SuperVeloce isnt faster..
lamboboy 13y ago
Seeing how i cannot afford either of these cars, price doesnt really matter to me. So i pick the Lamborghini everytime between these two. It look way better, it sounds better( in my opinion ofcourse), and it can be just as fast as the ZR1 on any track if not faster. And i just love the Murcielago anyway.
supercharged 15y ago
that is true why dont they just retest that vette to see what it can really do.