BMW 435i Performance vs Alfa Romeo Giulia QV
Category | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 3.0 l R6 | 2.9 l V6 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 340 / 335 | 510 / 503 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 450 / 332 | |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1621 / 3574 | 1708 / 3765 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 210 / 207 | 299 / 295 |
Average price | €57,000 | €89,000 |
Lap Times
Track | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
Hockenheim Short | 1:17.40 | 1:12.40 |
Sachsenring | 1:43.35 | 1:37.37 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.8 s | 1.2 s |
0 - 50 kph | 2.1 s | 1.7 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.9 s | 3.8 s |
0 - 130 kph | 7.6 s | 5.5 s |
0 - 160 kph | 11.7 s | 7.9 s |
0 - 200 kph | 17.3 s | 11.9 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.7 s | 3.6 s |
0 - 100 mph | 11.0 s | 8.1 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.4 s @ 91.3 mph | 8.4 s @ 101.3 mph |
1/4 mile | 13.3 s | 11.7 s @ 123.1 mph |
Rolling acceleration
Speed | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.6 s | 2.7 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.8 s | 3.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.1 s | 4.4 s |
80 - 120 kph (7) | 7.5 s | 6.6 s |
80 - 120 kph (8) | 10.5 s | 12.4 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.1 s | 5.7 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 10.0 s | 7.3 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.5 s | 9.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (7) | 16.4 s | 14.2 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.4 s | 8.5 s |
General performance
Category | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) | 309 kph (192 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.63 g (6 m/s²) | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 66.6 kph (41.4 mph) | 71.1 kph (44.2 mph) |
Fuel economy | 9.9 l/100 km (24 mpg US / 29 UK) | 7.2 l/100 km (33 mpg US / 39 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 37 m (120 ft) | 31 m (101 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 155 m (509 ft) | 126 m (415 ft) |
Summary
Category | BMW 435i Performance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 83 | 100 |
Straight line speed | 47 | 100 |
Overall | 68 | 100 |
Verdict
Giulia QV is the fastest by a huge margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.1k times.