The hellcat can do better burnout
Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat vs Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
| Category | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 6.4 l V8 | 6.2 l V8 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 717 / 707 | 659 / 650 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 881 / 650 | 881 / 650 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1984 / 4374 | 1771 / 3904 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 361 / 356 | 372 / 367 |
| Average price | €98,000 | €90,000 |
Lap Times
| Track | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| Sachsenring | 1:38.92 | 1:35.18 |
| Motortrend Figure-8 | 0:24.70 | 0:23.10 |
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.2 s | 2.9 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 8.8 s | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 10.7 s | 11.3 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.2 s | 2.7 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 4.6 s | 3.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.3 s | 3.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.4 s | 4.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 8.7 s | 5.9 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 17.0 s | 18.4 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s @ 103.1 mph | 8.2 s @ 104.4 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.7 s | 11.5 s @ 125.0 mph |
Braking distance
| Speed | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| 100 kph - 0 | 34 m (110 ft) | 32 m (104 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 132 m (435 ft) | 134 m (438 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 33 m (109 ft) | 29 m (96 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 47 m (154 ft) | 43 m (141 ft) |
General performance
| Category | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 320 kph (199 mph) | 318 kph (198 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.1 s @ 761 ft | 11.4 s @ 768 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.77 g (8 m/s²) | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
| Fuel economy | 14.7 l/100 km (16 mpg US / 19 UK) | 17.4 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 16 UK) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.94 g (9 m/s²) | 1.07 g (10 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Challenger SRT-8 | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 171 | 200 |
| Straight line speed | 2283 | 2681 |
| Total | 2454 | 2881 |
Verdict
Camaro ZL1 is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.1k times.
Acceleration graph
Hey Ya! 6y ago
Hellcat:
Pros:
Usable backseats, better rear visibility, 707 horsepower, fastest 0-150, more comfortable, and a cooler name.
Cons:
Terrible fuel economy (who cares?), Chrysler reliability, you WILL get caught speeding, and isn't very good around corners.
ZL1:
Pros:
faster 0-60, 0-100, 1/4 mile, better looking IMO, almost 300 LBS lighter, better transmission, better reliability, great at cornering, and higher top speed ( in testing it hit 202 one way and 194 another way)
Cons:
Rear seats for amputees, smaller trunk, headroom not great, ride as stiff as a corpse, Not 700+ HP, ugly steering wheel, and slower 0-150
