Porsche 911 Turbo vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S
Category | AMG GT S | Porsche 911 Turbo |
---|---|---|
Max power (ps / bhp) | 510 / 503 | 520 / 513 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 649 / 479 | 710 / 524 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1651 / 3640 | 1615 / 3560 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 309 / 305 | 322 / 318 |
Average price | €149,000 | €178,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration
Speed & distance | AMG GT S | Porsche 911 Turbo |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s | 0.9 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.4 s | 1.1 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.2 s | 1.5 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.0 s | 2.3 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.3 s | 2.9 s |
0 - 120 kph | 4.9 s | 4.2 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.0 s | 4.5 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.1 s | 5.4 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.1 s | 6.6 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.2 s | 8.5 s |
0 - 200 kph | 10.8 s | 10.3 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.0 s | 3.0 s |
0 - 100 mph | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.0 s @ 105.6 mph | 7.5 s @ 108.1 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.2 s @ 127.4 mph | 11.1 s |
Rolling acceleration
Speed | AMG GT S | Porsche 911 Turbo |
---|---|---|
80 - 120 kph (4) | 2.9 s | 3.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.9 s | 7.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
80 - 160 kph (7) | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
60 - 100 kph | 1.9 s | 1.5 s |
80 - 120 kph | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
General performance
Category | AMG GT S | Porsche 911 Turbo |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 313 kph (194 mph) | 315 kph (196 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 10.8 s @ 748 ft | 10.2 s @ 725 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.84 g (8 m/s²) | 1.03 g (10 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 71.5 kph (44.4 mph) | 73.1 kph (45.4 mph) |
Fuel economy | 10.8 l/100 km (22 mpg US / 26 UK) | 13.5 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 21 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) | 31 m (102 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 122 m (399 ft) | 122 m (401 ft) |
Summary
Category | AMG GT S | Porsche 911 Turbo |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 96 | 100 |
Straight line speed | 81 | 100 |
Overall | 90 | 100 |
Verdict
911 Turbo is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 2.9k times.