RUF BTR 3.4 vs Lamborghini Countach 5000 QV
| Category | Countach 5000 QV | RUF BTR 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 5.2 l V12 | 3.4 l B6 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 455 / 449 | 374 / 369 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 500 / 369 | 480 / 354 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1530 / 3373 | 1253 / 2762 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 297 / 293 | 298 / 294 |
Acceleration (mph)
| Speed & distance | Countach 5000 QV | RUF BTR 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 30 mph | 2.1 s | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.2 s | 4.3 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 10.4 s | 9.5 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 18.5 s | 16.9 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 25.1 s | 24.3 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.4 s @ 91.3 mph | 9.0 s @ 95.1 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.9 s @ 110.0 mph | 12.5 s @ 112.0 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| Speed & distance | Countach 5000 QV | RUF BTR 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.8 s | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.8 s | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 10.4 s | 9.5 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 13.0 s | 12.5 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 17.0 s | 15.5 s |
| 1000 m | 23.3 s @ 235.0 kph | 23.0 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.4 s | 3.5 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.2 s | 11.4 s |
General performance
| Category | Countach 5000 QV | RUF BTR 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 298 kph (185 mph) | 305 kph (190 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.65 g (6 m/s²) | 0.66 g (6 m/s²) |
| Fuel economy | 20.6 l/100 km (11 mpg US / 14 UK) | 16.8 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 17 UK) |
Summary
| Category | Countach 5000 QV | RUF BTR 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 0 | 0 |
| Straight line speed | 87 | 100 |
| Overall | 87 | 100 |
Verdict
BTR 3.4 is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.1k times.
Acceleration graph
