Times are way off. To 62 mph, the s2000 is neck and neck with the TT, at 100mph the s2000 is almost 2 seconds behind, but then by the end of the 1/4 mile it's ahead of the TT? No. That's wrong. See, this is what happens when you just pick you data from any old online site and don't cross check your info.
Honda S2000 vs Mazda RX-8 vs Audi TT 3.2 quattro vs Toyota MR-2 1.8 Roadster
Category | MR-2 1.8 | Mazda RX-8 | S2000 | TT 3.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Engine layout | R4 | R2 | R4 | V6 |
Max power (ps) | 140 | 231 | 239 | 250 |
Max torque (Nm) | 170 | 216 | 208 | 320 |
Curb weight (kg) | 1016 | 1387 | 1265 | 1448 |
Power / tonne (ps) | 138 | 167 | 189 | 173 |
Lap Times
Track | MR-2 1.8 | Mazda RX-8 | S2000 | TT 3.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vairano Handling Course | 1:24.95 | 1:24.54 | 1:25.64 | 1:23.77 |
Performance
Category | MR-2 1.8 | Mazda RX-8 | S2000 | TT 3.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 - 100 kph | 7.6 s | 6.6 s | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0 - 200 kph | 65.5 s | 30.5 s | 24.5 s | 23.8 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 57.4 s | 23.2 s | 19.5 s | 17.9 s |
0 - 60 mph | 7.2 s | 5.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
0 - 100 mph | 21.2 s | 16.0 s | 14.4 s | 12.8 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 11.2 s | 10.7 s | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile | 15.4 s | 14.5 s | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
Est. 1/2 mile | 30.2 s | 25.5 s | 24.1 s | 23.3 s |
Top speed | 211 kph | 235 kph | 242 kph | 250 kph |
Est. max acceleration | 0.42 g | 0.43 g | 0.49 g | 0.53 g |
Summary
Category | MR-2 1.8 | Mazda RX-8 | S2000 | TT 3.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Track Performance | 96 | 97 | 94 | 100 |
Straight line speed | 405 | 653 | 868 | 995 |
Total | 501 | 751 | 962 | 1095 |
Verdict
TT 3.2 quattro is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 3.9k times.
Acceleration graph
Yeah Mate 7y ago
I would say Pajero is quite good for BUMPY roads, or LandCruiser
P>S> Audi 3.2 is the only car that has 6 cilinders but wins by a little margin!! it would be fair to compare Audi 2.0 WITHOUT turbo to S2000 (cause all cars except Audi are I4 naturally aspirated engines)