Seat Leon Cupra 280 vs Renault Clio RS 220 Trophy
Category | Clio RS 220 Trophy | Seat Leon Cupra 280 |
---|---|---|
Max power (ps / bhp) | 220 / 217 | 280 / 276 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 280 / 207 | 350 / 258 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1264 / 2787 | 1351 / 2978 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 174 / 172 | 207 / 204 |
Average price | €28,000 | €35,000 |
Lap Times
Track | Clio RS 220 Trophy | Seat Leon Cupra 280 |
---|---|---|
Circuit de Nevers Magny-Cours Club | 1:29.00 | 1:25.10 |
Autozeitung test track | 1:46.00 | 1:37.70 |
Hockenheim Short | 1:15.50 | 1:14.40 |
Sachsenring | 1:46.55 | 1:40.13 |
Franciacorta | 1:29.39 | 1:28.65 |
Nürburgring Nordschleife | 8:23.00 | 7:58.40 |
Llandow | 0:49.00 | 0:46.90 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Clio RS 220 Trophy | Seat Leon Cupra 280 |
---|---|---|
0 - 50 kph | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
0 - 60 kph | 3.2 s | 3.3 s |
0 - 80 kph | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 6.4 s | 5.7 s |
0 - 120 kph | 8.9 s | 7.2 s |
0 - 130 kph | 9.8 s | 8.4 s |
0 - 140 kph | 11.9 s | 9.2 s |
0 - 160 kph | 14.8 s | 11.6 s |
0 - 180 kph | 17.8 s | 14.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 25.8 s | 18.3 s |
1000 m | 26.5 s @ 202.0 kph | 24.5 s @ 220.0 kph |
60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 6.5 s | 5.6 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 9.4 s | 6.7 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 5.3 s | 4.0 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 19.1 s | 13.8 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 10.4 s @ 82.6 mph | 9.9 s @ 87.0 mph |
1/4 mile | 14.7 s | 13.7 s @ 108.7 mph |
General performance
Category | Clio RS 220 Trophy | Seat Leon Cupra 280 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 235 kph (146 mph) | 250 kph (155 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.47 g (5 m/s²) | 0.52 g (5 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 68.3 kph (42.4 mph) | 71.0 kph (44.1 mph) |
Fuel economy | 5.4 l/100 km (44 mpg US / 53 UK) | 6.7 l/100 km (35 mpg US / 42 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 34 m (110 ft) | 32 m (106 ft) |
Summary
Category | Clio RS 220 Trophy | Seat Leon Cupra 280 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 616 | 700 |
Straight line speed | 2180 | 2846 |
Total | 2796 | 3546 |
Verdict
Leon Cupra 280 is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 2.6k times.