Ferrari 360 CS vs Lamborghini Gallardo

Picture of Ferrari 360 CS
Picture of Lamborghini Gallardo
Category Ferrari 360 CSLamborghini Gallardo
Engine layout 3.6 l V85.0 l V10
Max power (ps / bhp) 425 / 419500 / 493
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 373 / 275510 / 376
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1280 / 28221597 / 3521
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 332 / 327313 / 309
Average price €165,000€142,000

Acceleration

Speed & distance Ferrari 360 CSLamborghini Gallardo
0 - 40 kph 1.3 s1.4 s
0 - 80 kph 3.3 s3.2 s
0 - 100 kph 4.0 s4.0 s
0 - 120 kph 6.0 s5.4 s
0 - 140 kph 7.6 s6.4 s
0 - 180 kph 12.1 s10.1 s
0 - 200 kph 13.6 s13.0 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph 3.7 s2.7 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 9.6 s9.1 s
0 - 60 mph 4.0 s4.1 s
0 - 100 mph 8.4 s8.4 s
0 - 150 mph 23.9 s21.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile 8.4 s @ 100.0 mph8.7 s @ 99.4 mph
1/4 mile 12.2 s12.3 s

General performance

Category Ferrari 360 CSLamborghini Gallardo
Top speed 312 kph (194 mph)309 kph (192 mph)
Est. max acceleration 0.77 g (8 m/s²)0.75 g (7 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration 0.98 g (10 m/s²)1.00 g (10 m/s²)
70 mph - 0 51 m (167 ft)48 m (158 ft)

Summary

Category Ferrari 360 CSLamborghini Gallardo
Track Performance 485494
Straight line speed 16081849
Total 20932343

Verdict

Gallardo is the fastest by a small margin.

This comparison has been viewed 2.4k times.

User avatar
User avatar

wallenieswiftie  2m ago

The 360CS does not do 194mph.

 

User avatar

Metatron  2m ago

Now that's an interesting metric. It does seem high, I'll look into it at somepoint!


User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  2m ago

I agree, it does not have enough horsepower to reach 194 mph with the frontal area, and likely drag coefficient.


User avatar

wallenieswiftie  2m ago @07CorvetteZ51

In my opinion, the 0-100mph time isn't quite realistic either. 8.4 seconds is Porsche 911 GT2 (996), Lamborghini Murcielago LP580, Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG (R230) territory.


User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  4m ago

i always thought the gallardo wasnt the best handling car and was really heavy but damn it beat the 360 cs, impressive

 

User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  4m ago

I have always thought the Gallardo was an impressive car with excellent handling. I think it is fairly light for being AWD. I kind of doubt that the 360 CS weighs only 1280 kg, that must be the dry weight. Both of these cars are very beautiful and fast. I would like to try out a Gallardo on a track sometime. Fortunately, there is a place in Las Vegas that allows you to drive one on their track for a fee (Exotics Racing).


User avatar

wallenieswiftie  4m ago @07CorvetteZ51

Also the 0-124 time isn't actually 13.6 seconds on the 360, even the CS version. On speedometer that might be the case but GPS I'd put it more around 15.4-15.5. Around the same as a 993 Turbo and a base C6 Corvette.


User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  4m ago @07CorvetteZ51

yeah ferrari always quotes dry weight so u gotta add about 150 kg or so and that vegas thing is cool af


User avatar

Dino  7y ago

When I was shopping for either a 360 or a Gallardo, the 'G' was the better car, hands down. When I had an opportunity to drive the CS..... the CS is the more visceral experience. I bought a CS and I guess the market agrees as it's almost tripled in value since I bought it.


User avatar

Karthick01  12y ago

Yup They are very Close,Gallardo Wins Only Just.


User avatar

JayKarthi  12y ago

Lamborghini Wins