The 360CS does not do 194mph.
Ferrari 360 CS vs Lamborghini Gallardo
Category | Ferrari 360 CS | Lamborghini Gallardo |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 3.6 l V8 | 5.0 l V10 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 425 / 419 | 500 / 493 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 373 / 275 | 510 / 376 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1280 / 2822 | 1597 / 3521 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 332 / 327 | 313 / 309 |
Average price | €165,000 | €142,000 |
Lap Times
Track | Ferrari 360 CS | Lamborghini Gallardo |
---|---|---|
Vairano Handling Course | 1:21.02 | 1:19.36 |
Hockenheim Short | 1:13.00 | 1:11.80 |
Twin Ring Motegi East | 1:36.57 | 1:36.00 |
Nürburgring Nordschleife | 7:56.00 | 7:52.00 |
Marcoussis | 1:22.00 | 1:23.70 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Ferrari 360 CS | Lamborghini Gallardo |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s | 1.4 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.3 s | 3.2 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0 - 120 kph | 6.0 s | 5.4 s |
0 - 140 kph | 7.6 s | 6.4 s |
0 - 180 kph | 12.1 s | 10.1 s |
0 - 200 kph | 13.6 s | 13.0 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.7 s | 2.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.6 s | 9.1 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s | 4.1 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0 - 150 mph | 23.9 s | 21.4 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.4 s @ 100.0 mph | 8.7 s @ 99.4 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
General performance
Category | Ferrari 360 CS | Lamborghini Gallardo |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 312 kph (194 mph) | 309 kph (192 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.77 g (8 m/s²) | 0.75 g (7 m/s²) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.98 g (10 m/s²) | 1.00 g (10 m/s²) |
70 mph - 0 | 51 m (167 ft) | 48 m (158 ft) |
Summary
Category | Ferrari 360 CS | Lamborghini Gallardo |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 485 | 494 |
Straight line speed | 1608 | 1849 |
Total | 2093 | 2343 |
Verdict
Gallardo is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 2.4k times.
Acceleration graph
07CorvetteZ51 2m ago
I agree, it does not have enough horsepower to reach 194 mph with the frontal area, and likely drag coefficient.
wallenieswiftie 2m ago @07CorvetteZ51
In my opinion, the 0-100mph time isn't quite realistic either. 8.4 seconds is Porsche 911 GT2 (996), Lamborghini Murcielago LP580, Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG (R230) territory.
jeremyclarkson1 4m ago
i always thought the gallardo wasnt the best handling car and was really heavy but damn it beat the 360 cs, impressive
07CorvetteZ51 4m ago
I have always thought the Gallardo was an impressive car with excellent handling. I think it is fairly light for being AWD. I kind of doubt that the 360 CS weighs only 1280 kg, that must be the dry weight. Both of these cars are very beautiful and fast. I would like to try out a Gallardo on a track sometime. Fortunately, there is a place in Las Vegas that allows you to drive one on their track for a fee (Exotics Racing).
wallenieswiftie 4m ago @07CorvetteZ51
Also the 0-124 time isn't actually 13.6 seconds on the 360, even the CS version. On speedometer that might be the case but GPS I'd put it more around 15.4-15.5. Around the same as a 993 Turbo and a base C6 Corvette.
jeremyclarkson1 4m ago @07CorvetteZ51
yeah ferrari always quotes dry weight so u gotta add about 150 kg or so and that vegas thing is cool af
Dino 7y ago
When I was shopping for either a 360 or a Gallardo, the 'G' was the better car, hands down. When I had an opportunity to drive the CS..... the CS is the more visceral experience. I bought a CS and I guess the market agrees as it's almost tripled in value since I bought it.