Image of Audi R8 V10 5.2 FSI Coupe

Audi R8 V10 5.2 FSI Coupe (Mk I facelift) specs

Price in Europe €155,800 - €184,855
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1620-1690 kg (3571-3726 lbs)
Dimensions 4.44 m (175 in) long, 1.93 m (76 in) wide, 1.25 m (49 in) high
Wheelbase 2.65 m (104 in)
Introduced 2013
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 30.7-19.7 l/100 km (8-12 mpg US / 9-14 mpg UK)
Views 25.2k
Submitted by Eryk03

Lap times

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.4 s
0 - 100 kph3.6 s
0 - 160 kph7.6 s
0 - 200 kph11.7 s
0 - 60 mph3.2 s
0 - 100 mph7.1 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.0 s @ 104.4 mph
1/4 mile11.4 s @ 126.1 mph
Audi R8 V10 5.2 FSI Coupe acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed316 kph (196 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 011.4 s @ 794 ft
Est. max acceleration0.85 g (8 m/s²)
18m slalom70.7 kph (43.9 mph)
100 kph - 035 m (114 ft)
200 kph - 0135 m (443 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type 10 cylinders V 90°, Naturally-aspirated, DOHC, 4 Valves per Cyl, FSI
Displacement 5.2 l (318 ci / 5204 cc)
Power 525 ps (518 bhp / 386 kw) @ 8000 rpm
Torque 530 Nm (391 lb-ft) @ 6500 rpm
Power / liter 101 ps (100 hp)
Power / weight 317 ps (313 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 320 Nm (236 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 21 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 15 ps
Transmission 7 Speed S-Tronic Automatic or Optional 6-Speed manual
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

80 - 120 kph (4)3.6 s
80 - 120 kph (5)5.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6)6.7 s
80 - 120 kph (7)9.9 s
80 - 160 kph (4)7.1 s
80 - 160 kph (5)9.9 s
80 - 160 kph (6)13.4 s
80 - 160 kph (7)22.3 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph8.1 s
User avatar
User avatar

saxy  11y ago

Well, 11.4 to 126mph ie 202.7kph


User avatar

DeDe  11y ago

0-200 kph: 11,7 s

With cold semi-slicks and Launch Control. With hot tyres the grip holds back the useful wheelspin.

http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/sport-auto-audi-r8-v10-vs-porsche-911-turbo-amus-test-of-the-open-top-versions.50418/


User avatar

DeDe  12y ago

0-200 kph: 11,8 s

Source: AutoBild Sportscars via Audi's claim.

Also, please fix the drive to AWD.


User avatar

Alan  13y ago

please...........518bhp 525ps


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

@BR2, R8 have only naturally aspirated engine and are more RWD than AWD. 0-200 kmh is as it should.


User avatar

BR2,  13y ago

@Muse, I never said Audi couldnt be faster then the claimed times, notice the "Conservative" Part in my post?

@Mental, like u said, if a 4200lbs 420Hp S6 can do 3.7s to 60mph and the 3200lbs 335hp TT-RS can do 3.6s to 60mph, why wouldnt the more agressive New R8 which is 600lbs lighter, and/or 100bhp more not do 3.5s to 60mph or faster or slower then the S/RS? Given the Older R8 with 420hp did 0-60mph in 3.9s, And given that this new R8 has the same type of launch control these new Audis are getting.

Ever since the arrival of the Corvette C6 and GT-R, im not gonna say nothing is impossible in the motoring world.


User avatar

Mental  13y ago

@BR2
Damn, I can't actually believe that the sedan, which has only 420 PS and weights like a huge Brabus 800, reaches 60 in 3.7, like Zonda :O. The same with R8 V8. Maybe 4 s, maybe even a bit below 4, but 3.5! Oh man, I love R8, but it's just physically impossible, I think.


User avatar

muse  13y ago

@BR2, what you talking about?!
Audi in the real test always is better than what Audi says...
Pre face lift V10 Audi reported 3.9s to 100 km/h, in test was 3.7s... With that (s-tronic)will be only get better.


User avatar

BR2,  13y ago

Ty, But thats also a Typical Audi Conservtive time, id really wish Companys would stop doing that, very few performance cars dont go as fast as they say, and Audi is definetly one of them.

If anything, the R8 V8 will get to 60mph faster then the S6, which does in in 3.7s, I think, the only company that did a "Real" performance figure was Pontiac. I dont know too many ppl, or rather any that would get upset if there New R8 V8 didnt get to th performance numbers as fast as claimed Insurance or not.


User avatar

Mental  13y ago

@BR2
Here is performance data for all new R8s:

V8: manual transmission: top speed - 302 kph, 0-100 - 4.6 s; S-Tronic: 300 kph, 4.3 s.

V10: MT: 316 kph, 3.9 s; S-Tronic: 314 kph, 3.6 s.

V10 plus: MT: 319 kph, 3.8 s; S-Tronic: 317 kph, 3.5 s.

http://www.netcarshow.com/audi/2013-r8_v10_plus/


User avatar

BR2,  13y ago

Not much difference..But, considering how fast these new Audis(S4/S6/RS/RS30 are, these ones should be even faster, If they have the similiar launching capacities, maybe 3.5s and 8.7s 0-60-100 for the R8 V8?..


User avatar

Ferrari driver  13y ago

what do you mean?


User avatar

muse  13y ago

Ferrari driver... read something...


User avatar

Ferrari driver  13y ago

7 ps more than the old r8?
i love this car, but 7 ps?
REALLY?


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

Major changes to make when the antecedent is weak, apparently R8 was not weak as much.


User avatar

Mental  13y ago

@Eryk03
But why facelifted models can't differ from previous? It would be greater having more new big details.

Remember Lambo Murcielago. 2001 model wasn't very good in handling and, as for me, wasn't much beautiful. But in 2006 Lambo had facelifted Murcielago and the result was awesome. The handling has become better, increasing power in 50 PS, the acceleration and the top speed have become better, also it's exterior has become just brilliant.

The same could make Audi with R8 (and exactly with Audi's help Lambo facelifted Murcielago). Audi could increase the power: 450 PS for V8 and 550 PS for V10. Of course you can say that V10 plus has already 550 PS, but why don't make it as a basic V10 model? But then I suggest to create R8 with next-generation Gallardo V10 engine (I guess that it would be 600 PS) and then present it in 2013 as R8 V10 plus.


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

@Mental This is the Face lift not a new generation and not only such changes have occurred. There are hundreds of smaller changes which Audi does not inform. This is the face lift.


User avatar

Mental  13y ago

So there are only two differences: 7-S-Tronic gearbox and a bit changed exterior? I expected more...


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

This was to be 525 ps not bhp.. my bad. It is 525ps version.


User avatar

Derb  13y ago

i read the new one will have 550ps


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

525 ps not bhp, my bad.