Image of Audi TT RS Plus

Audi TT RS Plus specs

Price in Europe €63,000
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1435-1499 kg (3164-3305 lbs)
Dimensions 4.20 m (165 in) long, 1.84 m (73 in) wide, 1.34 m (53 in) high
Wheelbase 2.47 m (97 in)
Introduced 2012
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 15.7-7.4 l/100 km (15-32 mpg US / 18-38 mpg UK)
Views 33.6k
Submitted by DeDe

Performance

0 - 80 kph2.8 s
0 - 100 kph4.0 s
0 - 130 kph6.3 s
0 - 180 kph11.7 s
0 - 200 kph14.9 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph11.0 s
0 - 60 mph3.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.6 s @ 98.2 mph
1/4 mile12.3 s
Top speed280 kph (174 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.77 g (8 m/s²)
18m slalom64.3 kph (40.0 mph)
100 kph - 036 m (118 ft)
Audi TT RS Plus acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type 5-cylinder-turbo
Displacement 2.5 l (151 ci / 2480 cc)
Power 360 ps (355 bhp / 265 kw) @ 5500 rpm
Torque 465 Nm (343 lb-ft) @ 1650 rpm
Power / liter 145 ps (143 hp)
Power / weight 246 ps (242 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 317 Nm (234 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 31 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 29 ps
Transmission 6-speed-manual, 7-speed-double-clutch
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

hostboy  2y ago

Delete


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

The F50 is even incredible by todays standards, 20 years, 10 years, today, Its a Magnificient machine and is still enjoyed to the fullest by its owners and/or drivers, Sure it may lack the electronics to help you and the overall tech, But as of 2014, It is still incredible in practically every way.

@Hamcee

How can you call the R8 and TT overpriced POS?..an R8 is 78k and a TT is 45k, I think that's pretty good, I actually don't think theres an Audi today that's overpriced, Maybe it may be a little hard to justify 30k in a V10 Plus over a V10, But that's all I can see.


User avatar

Hans  11y ago

You mad? lol of course you mad.
You know Audi only from the pictures. loser.


User avatar

Hamcee  11y ago

unlike the audi tt and r8 which were always overpriced piece of shits.


User avatar

Hans  11y ago

f50 was good 20 years ago.

And there is no way that stock TTRS is faster than F50 on good surface and with driver who knows how to drive such car.

True, but average driver could bit F50 with this TT.


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

What kind of person calls an F50 a shitcar?..

Well I guess anybody would if your a German Awd fanboy. And the ONLY thing this would beat an F50 is, Is 0-30, Don't even compare the 2.


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

F50 "shitcar" with no traction ?

F50 is a hardcore supersport car with 521 hp. It is a car that is not easy to drive but it is a car for skilled drivers.

And there is no way that stock TTRS is faster than F50 on good surface and with driver who knows how to drive such car.


User avatar

Hans  11y ago

Bentley is a heavy GT, CTSV is a have saloon, and F50 is an old shitcar with no traction, that's why TT-RS can be faster.
But those last times are mesured by tacho, on GPS would be little more.


User avatar

loshmi  11y ago

13,1 stock ? yeah, maybe, with a 300 kg weight reduction. according to variable, more reliable sources, best 0-200 times range from 14,9-15,3 for a TT RS. all those 13,1, etc, and other crazy times, were made by cars tuned by private individuals. heck, even a bentley continental gt speed reaches nowhere near 13,1 to 200, but 13,2. and the cadillac cts-v goes from a dead stop to that fast at around the same or similar time. a ferrari f50 can do 0-160 in 8,4.


User avatar

kidder  11y ago

If not downhill, the car could have been tuned, because only a fool would think that a stock TT RS Plus can hit 100 mph in 8.4 seconds.


User avatar

kidder  11y ago

The car in that video was going downhill.


User avatar

huh  11y ago

@kickmonster1991

you forgot that 200 km/h in that video is really around 185 km/h


User avatar

kickmonster1991  11y ago

0-160 km/h: 8.4 sec
0-200 km/h: 13.1 sec

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k6WnEWYqMw


User avatar

benzsl  11y ago

0-100kph:4,1
0-130kph:6,3
0-180kph:11,7
0-200kph:14,9
0-400m:12,3

AMS 2/2014


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

its fast, but don't kid yourself in thinking its faster then a 1st Generation GT-R.


User avatar

Tiflo  11y ago

0-200 in 13,1s stock via http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYb2bFXW8_c
like GT-R 485ps :)


User avatar

PLUS  12y ago

0-200 is surely faster than 15.0s


User avatar

Shaggy  12y ago

I remember when the Audi TT forst came out, I thought it looked wimpy, this one sure as heck doesn't, I love it!


User avatar

benzsl  12y ago

Nordschleife(full lap) 8:11

by Autobild sportcar 2/2012


User avatar

benzsl  12y ago

Nordschleife(full lap) 8:11

by Autobild sportcar 2/2012



User avatar

Bnonymous  13y ago

...or even beat it


User avatar

Bnonymous  13y ago

This could come close to the old standard R8. More laptimes, please :-)


User avatar

Eryk03  13y ago

Yes, I know. Thanks for reminder.


User avatar

Julle85  13y ago

@Eryk03

I am not sure what Nurburgringlap is this. Do you know?

http://www.autobild.de/artikel/corvette-gs-tt-rs-plus-911-carrera-s-m3-coupe-test-3598910.html



User avatar

WTF?  13y ago

What is wrong with this time???? TT-S with 100 hp less did it 4 secounds better!!!


User avatar

Julle85  13y ago

@DeDe

How about 0-100km/h? :D


User avatar

DeDe  13y ago

I am confused. Why Audi TT-RS Coupe and Audi TT-RS Plus roadster hits both 0-100km/h 3.9 seconds, but TT-RS Plus Coupe is slower.

Because it isn't. The 0-200 kph time of 15,0 s belongs to the TT RS Roadster (tested by AutoBild Sportscars), the Coupé is at least 0,5 s faster (14,5 est.).


User avatar

Julle85  13y ago

I am confused. Why Audi TT-RS Coupe and Audi TT-RS Plus roadster hits both 0-100km/h 3.9 seconds, but TT-RS Plus Coupe is slower.

TT-RS Plus Coupe(much lighter) and Roadster hits both 0-200km/h..God damn it, more test for a TT-RS Plus Coupe.