Bristol Fighter T specs

It exists but it was never sold to anyone.

https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-reviews/38963/bristol-fighter-t

I can confirm this is a seriously powerful cat - and yes - it was geared to go well above 200mph+ . Fun fact - it also had a wading depth of 50cm. It was all clever dynamics. They made 13 - 4 are unmade and can be built to a specification today

I drive one!

It is kind of sexy if you look at it from the side.

Topspeed(claimed): 362 kph

@ BR2': I knew it was a Viper engine! :D

Didn't Bristol shut its doors back in 2011?

Anyway, the car certainly doesn't look too much attractive. But damn, that power in such a conservative body from such a conservative brand! It looks much slower and from 80-ties.

It has the engine from the 2002 Viper GTS with a Big turbo

And it starts at £400,000..

@ Fangio Man: It should, it has the engine from a 1st or 2nd generation Dodge Viper, only modified.

I would lie if I say it looks good.

But this Torque is just brutal!

they can claim what they want.. what i would like to see is long enough strait something like 15 km strait ashphalt road and see if it can do it.. even vw's track wont do it for me.. salt ? no tnx

I wouldn't be surprised if it collapsed standing stationary just under it's own weight...

Only way it can do 400+ kph is if fired as a cannonball from a giant cannon.

@ Jezza

I seriously doubt that.
They claimed it could go that fast, but they never showed proof of it, and then they limited the speed to 225. So no, it is technically slower.

This would fall apart over 300 kph :D

This is faster than veyron ss
fighter-435
veyron ss-415

where did you find that 1/4 mile? the 9.6 at 157? i cant find any data on this car for the life of me!

The Bristol will bankrupt soon.

Here is some picture about the Bristol service:
http://galeria.totalcar.hu/blogok/2009/11/05/bristol_szerviz/?current_image_num=0&image_size=l

YES

so, is this faster than a bugatti veyron??

7 seconds who said that we all know this car cant do a 7 second 1/4 mile. maybe if it weighed 1400lbs but it doesnt 9.6@157 is the best i could find..lol

The 1/4 mile time has been deleted already but I think it claimed the 1/4 in 7 seconds which is not possible in this sort of car.

dont assume it wrong..

I don't think there is any proof of that 1/4 mile time so don't assume its correct.

WOW is all one can say just look at that 1/4 mile time.. only a hand full of other cars can beat it thats awesomeeee