Image of Caterham Seven 160

Caterham Seven 160 specs

Car type Open-wheeler
Curb weight 490 kg (1080 lbs)
Power / weight 166 ps (163 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 218 Nm (161 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2014
Origin country United Kingdom
Average fuel consumption 6.9 l/100 km (34 mpg US / 41 mpg UK)
Views 4.5k
Submitted by Fangio Man

Performance

Top speed 160 kph (99 mph)
0 - 50 kph 2.4 s
0 - 100 kph 7.0 s
0 - 130 kph 13.0 s
1/4 mile 15.6 s
100 kph - 0 52 m (169 ft)

Powertrain

Engine type Suzuki Straight 3
Displacement 0.7 l (40 ci / 660 cc)
Power 81 ps (80 bhp / 60 kw) @ 7000 rpm
Torque 107 Nm (79 lb-ft) @ 3400 rpm
Power / liter 123 ps (121 hp)
Efficiency 12 PS per l/100 km
Transmission Suzuki 5 speed Manual
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 3

Track Time
Blyton Park Circuit 1:17.60
Mallory Park 1:05.70
Top Gear Track 1:45.50 w

Seven 160 rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Viking  5y ago

Yeah, this car has such easy access, I might be tempted to do all my own maintenance (again) if I owned one. I have gotten a bit lazy in recent years, and now even pay for someone else to do oil changes.


User avatar

Shaggy  5y ago

That engine is so tiny!


User avatar

FastestLaps  5y ago

Not bad! It does look super short tho :D

It would look even shorter if it wasn't for the oversized valve cover, intake and auxilaries like battery.

It must be the easiest car to work on :D Access is perfect.


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

"I wonder how compact that Suuki engine looks in that long hood."

Here you go!

Caterham-Seven-160-2497114.jpg


User avatar

FastestLaps  5y ago

I wonder how compact that Suuki engine looks in that long hood.

Although it does at least have turbocharger which should add some substance to the looks of otherwise tiny engine :D


User avatar

lafars  5y ago

@mental

this is perfect for norway, why? because we have horsepower, weight and volumetaxes for cars instead of the more logical CO2 and NOx....and then the one-time fee comes too


User avatar

Mental  5y ago

A Suzuki engine? Couldn't Caterham find any better alternative?

80 bhp is too weak by today's standards.. even for a 490 kg vehicle.

This Caterham could be useful for training courses only.

And I hate those cheap stamped rims.

For 20k Euros I could afford a Focus ST, which is BTW faster and way more practical.


User avatar

Shaggy  5y ago

That looks fun to drive, even with only 80 horsepower.


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

0-60 mph: 6.5 seconds
Topspeed: 160 kph
Price will start at around 20.000 €

Timeline

User avatar
fakekillerfour 2h 

added data for Porsche 911 Targa 4 GTS (2017)

Latest topics

Nissan GT-R Nismo brings new Tsukuba lap record for "cars with doors" 1
2 days ago by FastestLaps

Alfa Romeo Europe’s most reliable brand? 10
3 days ago by Inline 6 rules

7:38 - BMW M3 CS falls six seconds behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia QV 6
3 days ago by Pacho Kardana

ZR1 sets lap record at VIR 5
5 days ago by aaaa

Jaguar XJ220 vs Bugatti EB110 SS 2
1 week ago by Fastedee

25,000 mph Tesla Roadster ready to launch into deep space 12
2 weeks ago by FastestLaps

Active users

fakekillerfour, Tyrone1, FastestLaps, honzakoubek, Chanante, QA51M, Freakz, hostboy, DeDe, AryoJ, tyler, manone, rhs1992, Inline 6 rules, Mario149, moegigo