Yeah, 5.2 seems a bit slow. The C5 Vettes hook up very well. I would expect roughly 5.0 for a 0-100 kph w/out roll out. In any case the page should be eliminated, since we already have a page with the correct info.
The 5.2 0-100km/h comes from sport auto, and if we remember that american magazines test with 1foot roll out, the fastest real 0-60 of this car was 4.5, 0-62 in 5.2 is about the same pace as the C&D 2001 test, 4.8 0-60mph, 10.7 0-100mph (times had an extra 0.3s to represent real acceleration without roll out)
Yet again 0-60mph isnt 0-100kmh, its 0-62mph. but your right, the C5 ZO6 with 405bhp does 0-60mph in 3.9, but this one with 385bhp does it in 4.2, so 0-100kmh will be round 4.5, thats why there should be both metric an imperial datas displayed.
OK SERIOUSLY THE INFO ON THE ZO6 NEEDS TO BE FIXED! ALL THE RIVAL RESULTS ARE WRONG BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT SOMEONE THINKS THIS CAR HAS A 0 TO 60 TIME OF 5.2 SECONDS. THE CAR IS RATED IN THE 2002 MODEL TO DO 0-60 IN 3.9 SECONDS. GRANTED THAT MAY BE ALITTLE OPTIMISTIC BUT I DOUBT THAT IT IS ANY SLOWER THAN 4.2 WITH A DECENT DRIVER. PLEASE FIX!
The years for the C5Z06's are all screwed up. Reality is the 2001 C5Z06 was 385hp and the 2002-2004 C5Z06 was 405hp. But somehow you have one listed as a 2003 with 380hp and the other called a '02-'04 called a 2001. ???? I know the n'ring time was done with a 2004 model, but were the rest of these times from a 2001? I doubt it. Truthfully, there is soo little performance difference between the years that they should be combined and just called C5Z06. Sadly, there are soo few times for this extremely strong and popular track car that splitting them into two different cars over an unnoticeable 20hp is counterproductive. But if they must be split up, at least get the years corrected.