Image of Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV

Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1664-1766 kg (3668-3893 lbs)
Dimensions 4.71 m (185 in) long, 2.06 m (81 in) wide, 1.14 m (45 in) high
Wheelbase 2.67 m (105 in)
Power / weight 391 ps (385 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 385 Nm (284 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2009
Origin country Italy
Views 111.6k
Submitted by Chiesi

Performance

Top speed 342 kph (213 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.2 s
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 60 kph 1.9 s
0 - 80 kph 2.0 s
0 - 100 kph 3.0 s
0 - 130 kph 4.8 s
0 - 180 kph 8.0 s
0 - 200 kph 9.9 s
0 - 300 kph 29.7 s
0 - 60 mph 2.8 s
0 - 100 mph 6.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.0 s @ 101.3 mph
1/4 mile 10.9 s
Est. 1/2 mile 17.2 s @ 154.1 mph
Est. 1 mile 28.0 s @ 180.8 mph
1000 m 19.7 s @ 268.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 6.9 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 19.8 s
0 - 100 mph - 0 12.0 s
60 mph - 0 30 m (98 ft)
Lateral acceleration 1.00 g (10 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

hr  4y  

I guess that murcielago is the best car in my idea .[img][/img]


User avatar

Karthick01  4y  

I Think This Car Rivals The Ferrari 599 GTO and Porsche 997 Turbo S PDK.


User avatar

S  4y  

Quarter mile time? 10.9? Hmmm that's slow!


User avatar

Aquib  4y  

Well!it is faster than the pagani zonda and ferrari enjo on a racing track :-)



User avatar

Dave  5y  

That standing mile estimate is REALLY REALLY GOOD.
.youtube.com/watch?v=a2UV7CDcxw8&feature=plcp

I think with a perfect launch and perfect shifts it a 27 second car.


User avatar

Mental  5y  

RWD Aventador? Yeah, it would be then much lighter, and I guess would be even more fun to drive! :D


User avatar

lamboboy  5y  

I think this is still my favourite car. What a masterpiece. It is just perfect. I just wish they also made a rear wheel drive version like they have for the Gallardo.


User avatar

Ferrari driver  5y  

there were i live are over 20 units of this car.


User avatar

soybeanmilk  5y  

Slower than their own lp640 ...



User avatar

....  5y  

the best car ever built..


User avatar

2mase4u  6y  

the most beautiful car ever build...


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

Thanks Smugolo (:


User avatar

Smugolo  6y  

@Mike B

Search for the 3.0s and 9.9s times in AUTO ZEITUNG 18/2009.


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98311_4_122_77lo.jpg

I found it, the test from Automobilismo, 0-1000m in 19.7 @ 268.1km/h


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

On Nring? no, it's not a false time, is a manufacturer laptime

The 7:42 for this was a one lap attempt and the stock suspension settings are not suited for bumpy tracks like the Nring (the LP570 has suffered the same fate at Nring tests)
A properly set up SV driven by the factory will probably do around 7:25.


User avatar

gallardo man  6y  

how come its so slow on lap times. its strange its slower than a camaro...... probably false lap times on the camaro


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

http://www.auto.it/prove/lamborghini/murcielago/2009/12-3802/scheda/Lamborghini+Murci%C3%A8lago+SV%3A+0-100+in+3%22

Edit: the trapspeed of the 0-1km is not 267km/h ... it is either 268 or 269, I'm gonna search for it


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

On the SV vs GT-R test? it can't be, they got 3.2 and 10.8 mmm


User avatar

FastestLaps  6y  

@Mike B It's AutoBild Sportscars 11/2009


User avatar

Mike B  6y  

I'll like to know the source of the 0-100km/h and 0-200km/h


User avatar

Apathy  6y  

This car is about more than just speed.
Much more.


User avatar

Sal30  6y  

too bad for 500K it's still slower than a 100K ZR1. pity.


User avatar

gallardo man  6y  

very good car


User avatar

lamboboy  6y  

the nurburgring time is bullshit!


User avatar

sam11855  6y  

soz i ment #2


User avatar

sam11855  6y  

best lambo

User avatar

Wads  7y  

Igor.... yes we have that 0-60 time already


User avatar

igor  7y  

the road and track did 0-60 in 2.8 seconds