McLaren Mercedes SLR 722 specs

I love this car

Engine has 5,439 cc = 5,4 l*

Please change the main photo to this one:

The best Mercedes ever made.

Anyone knows what 722 means?

these were meant to be niche cars, and benz has made quite a few...like the 2 ton sl65 amg black

Put those pirelli pzero trofeo R tires on this and you have no more traction issues :P or maybe sport cups?

Any Source For The 1/4 mile ?.

There is a reason: traction. The best 0-100 kph time (and I mean real 0-100, not shitty 1-ft-rollout time calculation) for the SLR is 3,8, and 3,8 s for the SLR 722 as well.

Its limited traction allows no better times.

0-300-0: 37 seconds
300-0: 7.4 seconds

Source: http://www.sportauto.de/news/aktion-0-300-0-mercedes-slr-mclaren-722-1143473.html

The fastest 0-100 kph I could find is 3.8 seconds, tested by sport auto.

BS.

If a Base SLR reaches 60Mph in 3.5s(0-100Kph 3.7s), theres no reason why this 722 couldnt do 3.5s 0-100Kph with its 722 upgrades.

I would like to see the source of that 3,5 s 0-100 kph, lol.

Never.

Fortunetley your wrong..

TOPSPEED NISSAN GTR-ONLY 310KMPH

5.4L V8,680BHP,830NM,TOPSPEED-337KM/H
,0-60MPH@3S,AUTOMATIC GEARBOX
THE FASTEST AUTOMATIC ROAD CAR

I guess Top Gear (the British one, not the less interesting American version) never had the time to put THIS around the track. I wonder how it will perform, though.

http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?350
that ones better, 3635lbs/1648.8kg

sorry just saw mick has the same source

i thought this car was lighter? like 1648kg or 1647, somewhere around there
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
EDIT: 1649kg

weight: 1649kg, power 641bhp, 0-200kmh 10.2
there, fixed
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/207995/mercedesbenz_slr_722.html
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
http://www.slr-uk.com/carspec722.html
That enough sources for ya E???

Whats da Price!?!?

What is the US price of this car???

7:30 is what i hear.

Mercedes may have racing heritage, but a sports-exotic production car they have none. With the prices of these kind of cars and the fact that much cheaper cars overperform the 722, should be rather embarrassing to Mercedes, especially when only their racecar can crack the 7:30s and this 722, definitly will not.

ring time guess 7:35.5

O yeah i can definetly agree Kia's ar awful car, but they dont come close to a DaeWoo..lol

btw i will agree kias are awful cars so we have something.

lol completely missing th point again. there are categories that are not raw speed and raw price no matter i say it you never get the point and brag that one car can corner faster. how do i have to say it? ive just realized myself it doesnt work often try to get th message befor responding maybe that will help.

This cannot even beat a Ford gt and the nissan beats the ford easily and at the ring where it beats it by like 35 seconds!!!! And were talking cars not bikes retard. But i expected a comment like that from someone who owns a kia.