Image of Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series

Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series (Aerodynamic Pack) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1748 kg (3854 lbs)
Dimensions 4.76 m (188 in) long, 1.85 m (73 in) wide, 1.39 m (55 in) high
Wheelbase 2.77 m (109 in)
Power / weight 296 ps (292 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2011
Origin country Germany
Views 95.6k
Submitted by phavyarden

Performance

Top speed 300 kph (186 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.6 s
0 - 50 kph 2.0 s
0 - 80 kph 3.3 s
0 - 100 kph 3.9 s
0 - 130 kph 6.0 s
0 - 180 kph 11.2 s
0 - 200 kph 12.7 s
0 - 60 mph 4.0 s
0 - 100 mph 8.4 s
0 - 150 mph 22.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.9 s @ 96.3 mph
1/4 mile 12.1 s @ 118.1 mph
1000 m 22.4 s @ 240.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 8.8 s
60 mph - 0 30 m (99 ft)

More acceleration times

Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

Boy86x  8m  

C63 AMG Coupe Black Series (W204) : 7:46
M3 GTS (E92): 7:48

Stevo: the C63 Black Series is notba "very" heavy car, it has only 1630kg, and a better laptime then M3 GTS which has only 1530kg ;)


User avatar

stevo  4y  

The c63 black is very gud car,love the noise. The only thing wrong with it is that its very heavy.


User avatar

DeDe  5y  

0-50 kph: 2,0 s
0-130 kph: 6,0 s
0-160 kph: 8,4 s
0-200 kph: 12,7 s

Source: AutoBild Sportscars - http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/AutoBild%20Sportscars%20-%20Scans%202012/ABSC042012%20-%20M3%20CRT%20vs%20C63%20AMG%20Black%20Series/5.jpg


User avatar

DeDe  5y  

0-60mph: 4,0 s
0-150mph: 22,6 s
1 km: 22,4 s (149mph)
** Source:** Autocar - http://i.imgur.com/mqnow.jpg


User avatar

BRZi  5y  

@BR2
So jealous, wish I had a chance to drive both of the cars and compare which one is better


User avatar

BR2,  5y  

More power, lighter weight, grippier tyres...And still does the SAME as a C63 AMG Coupe PP in acceleration?

Somethings not right, either MT buffed on the Acceleration run, or something else is amiss.

WHatever the case, for $108,000 Usd, (Which i thought it would be atleast 30k more) Is an Incredible bargain! I dont care what MotorTrend Says, IMO, this car to me, is more of a Drivers Car, then the 991 911 Carrera S.



User avatar

Independent Guy  5y  

No he isn't way better....


User avatar

Jeff B  6y  

Disregard the Adam motorsports park time, the time is for the TG track.

And yes the new stig is way faster than old.


User avatar

Rocky  6y  

Sorry, i meant Nordschleife.


User avatar

Rocky  6y  

I also think that in the summer, this car on this track.....better lap time.


User avatar

Rocky  6y  

O, Ok, thenks.:)


User avatar

phavyarden  6y  

I don' remember if it was M, R&T or C&D who tested at laguna seca but they didn't publish a lap time, they just test the car ;)


User avatar

Rocky  6y  

The Laguna Seca lap time is missing.


User avatar

DeDe  6y  

The gearbox is no DCT, it's an MCT (multi-clutch transmission).


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  6y  

It's a 2011 car not 2012.


User avatar

FastestLaps  6y  

Ultimate "cockmobile"?


User avatar

Georg  6y  

@Jeff

I never claimed that the 458 is in the same league as the C63 ;)


User avatar

Jeff B  6y  

@Man1 There are 2 458 times, one 1.09.7 and a 1.10.5
@Georg Don't be silly this car isn't quite in the same league as the 458


User avatar

Georg  6y  

@man1

this one was on semi slicks with aero pack, dif lock and track pack...
the 458 isn´t a unbeatable god...


User avatar

man1  6y  

ahahahahah as fast as a 458? buhahahah... these germans are too much of a joke!


User avatar

Tension  6y  

is it me or is the old clk black better looking than this new c black?


User avatar

phavyarden  6y  

@Alan
We'll have to wait and see lap times and test's, then we can make our conclussions


User avatar

Alan  6y  

Only the transmission is better, 7-speed AMG MCT.

no aluminium, same engine, everything else is same


User avatar

Alan  6y  

Is this car any better than the CLK63 AMG Black series 2007?

I guess not and yet 5 years has passed


User avatar

Bnonymous  6y  

Usually a BMW corners better than a Mercedes. Maybe this one is different.


User avatar

E  6y  

I think this car will probably accelerate faster too, but the M3 might have an advantage in the corners. Generally lighter cars corner better, but when you add downforce, the lighter car can gain a lot more. But it depends on how much downforce each car actually has.


User avatar

phavyarden  6y  

Yes, it's a little bit heavier but it has 60 hp more, 180 Nm more. I thik that would make a difference, but we have to wait and see the results.


User avatar

E  6y  

The rear wing isn't all that big. Also, while I'm not sure how much downforce each car makes, 1 lb of downforce makes a bigger impact on a lighter car than it does on a heavier car.


User avatar

phavyarden  6y  

I don't know man,it has more power, more torque and a huge downforce, look at all that spoilers.
I think it would kick M3 gts ass