Mercedes-Benz CL 65 AMG specs

These guys commenting from 18 years ago probably have kids and are married lol

Will anyone find this comment?

0 to 60 in 3.8 secs

To the first anonymous poster: Do us all a favour and shoot yourself, moron.

this car is purposeles beacuase v12 engine and two turbo for in order to 2t very stupid

I wouldn't say anything just in case somebody wants to become your stalker! ;-)

crni09, is there are single word that you can spell properly?

Why would anyone be interested to know where I am from? It does not matter. In Internet we are just one global society.

And I am not trying to hide where I come from. I am really pround of my country and there is no need at all to hide my origin.

ok, wands

Fastestlaps can say himself just in case he wants his location to remain a secret.

P.S. beather is actually spelt "better" :-)

i am from croatia where is fastestlap.

Sunny London

are you from italy

And on the Autozeitung track the E46 M3 is 2 seconds slower.....

look at times on the hockeihim short you se bmw m3 e46 is fast 2 second

??? in a straight line this is MUCH quicker than an E46 M3

this car is not the faster the m3 e46 beacusea mercedes and mass is big problem

The 11.8 quarter mile trap speed was actually 120.9 so 12.8 to 124mph seems reasonable.

the 0-200kmh is not no 12.8 0r no 13.8. if you people have relised its passes the quartermile in 11.8 seconds, and guess what its trap speed is?....124mph/200kmh:O my god people..

Amazing how shitty the speed numbers are considering the HP and TORQUE numbers. Pathetic mercedes and their tanks.

0-200km/h= 12.8 s .... the number 13.8 was wrong !!

1/4 mile - 11.8 sec

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0510_luxury_sport_coupes_comparison/612_cl65_specs_price.html