Image of Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1590 kg (3505 lbs)
Power / weight 183 ps (181 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 256 Nm (189 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2008
Origin country Japan
Views 32.8k
Submitted by Georg

Performance

Top speed 250 kph (155 mph)
0 - 60 mph 5.7 s
0 - 100 mph 13.9 s
1/4 mile 13.9 s @ 100.0 mph
1000 m 31.1 s @ 166.0 kph

Powertrain

Engine type inline4 16V DOHC turbo
Displacement 2.0 l (122 ci)
Power 291 ps (287 bhp / 214 kw) @ 6500 rpm
Torque 407 Nm (300 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm
Power / liter 145 ps (144 hp)
Transmission Six-speed twin-clutch sequential manual gearbox, four-wheel drive, S-A
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 4

Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST rivals

User avatar

User avatar

aaa  3y  

top gear lap time is for FQ360 not for FQ300

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4CfWdoSOTk


User avatar

Dirtdickler  6y  

Well the link didn't work but if you do a quick goggle search it's there.


User avatar

Dirtdickler  6y  

EVO X MR:

1/4 mile: 13.2@103.6
0-60: 4.6

.roadandtrack.com/content/download/69763/1764364/version/3/file/CT_2010-Ford-Taurus-SHO-vs-2010-Mitsubishi-Lancer-Evolution-MR-Touring_data.pdf


User avatar

mrevo7  6y  

mitsubishi ruined them with the 10. 1590kg is far too heavy without any increase in power. my 7 is about 1250kg or something similar - earlier models even lighter.


User avatar

dirtdickler  6y  

5.7 sec 0-60?? 1/4 mile: 13.9@100?

This is the same EVO X MR that we have in the states right?

If so those acceleration times a way slow...

Road & Track recorded a 13.4@104.6 for the 1/4mile and something like 4.7 sec for 0-60.

I've never seen 0-60 and 1/4 mile times posted so slow for this car.


User avatar

justEVO  7y  

Sherbert u knob as if a 5k vaux can do a 30k evo x.Evo driver saw u coming and thought not wasting juice on that tattered luton dustcart.


User avatar

Sherbert  7y  

I Just blew one of these out of the water in my 5k Vauxhall! hahahahaha What a waste of money


User avatar

Anonymous  8y  

It doesnt mean that, thats just slang for it, its Frequently Quick.


User avatar

Big'Bum123  8y  

hey evreyone do ya know 'fq' means ****in quick???


User avatar

Tony  8y  

how much coast this car


User avatar

ajfnddsa  8y  

hey wasn't the evox faster than the impreza in the top gear track??

in the episode appears.


User avatar

Georg  9y  

corrected


User avatar

PhantomPorsche  9y  

This Evo lapped the Top Gear track in 1:28.22 not 1:28.2


User avatar

Georg  10y  

thats wrong the UK tested Evo X FQ300 is the japan spec version only avaible in the UK not the rest of europe.
The rest of Europe recive the same MR version as sold in the USA..


User avatar

Anonymous  10y  

Actually, it's quite clear the new MR (or equivalent anyway, the euro FQ300 SST) is faster than the older models around a track. The two times put up by the VII's are both modded cars getting a good deal more power than a stock VII would. The SST FQ300 is a plain stock US MR.

Just my 2 cents.


User avatar

Heyhuub  10y  

They said it was a six-speed, seeing as the manual is a 5 speed...
The fq360 they had was indeed a 5 speed.


User avatar

Wads  10y  

The Top Gear lap time was a manual version I think rather than the SST.


User avatar

Georg  10y  

It is Mitsubishi model politic...
the perfromance different between the models could be huge by completely different cerb weight and power.. the SST is the dual clutch version which Evo Magazine has tested..
Not every Evo offers the same track perfromance clearly visible now that we have corrected the laptimes by claiming the correct model which has done the laptime.. just look at the TopGear track.. many used the Evo laptimes there to show the perfromance of a basic Evo.. ignoring that they were driven by hardcore FQ 320-400 models which are way more expansive as the basic model.


User avatar

FastestLaps  10y  

Evo X FQ300 SST. It would be so much easier if there was just one EVO X instead of thousand different versions that do not have that much difference performance-wise. What they have are increasingly stupid and complicated names to mask the fact that EVO X is actually slower than EVO VI. Evolution is considered to be process of improvement. Therefore Mitsubishi should really call EVO X "Lancer Degradation X".

User avatar
saxy 11h 

liked BR2+ post

Active users

saxy, tyler, fakekillerfour, BR2+, FastestLaps, Flabernat, DeDe, lawrencefearon, Fastedee, csteigerwalt

Latest topics

2017 racing season starts tomorrow 40
11 hours ago by saxy

The new, "down-sized" Audi RS5 14
13 hours ago by BR2+

Data submission requests 148
1 day ago by fakekillerfour

Dodge Viper ACR goes "HAM" on 14 tracks, "spanks" Porsche 918 1
2 days ago by lawrencefearon

Shame on Ferrari, shame on McLaren 88
5 days ago by Fastedee

Aston Martin DB11 is much faster than S-Class coupe 20
5 days ago by Fastedee