Image of Porsche 911 Carrera 4S

Porsche 911 Carrera 4S (991) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1465 kg (3230 lbs)
Dimensions 4.49 m (177 in) long, 1.85 m (73 in) wide, 1.30 m (51 in) high
Wheelbase 2.45 m (96 in)
Power / weight 273 ps (269 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 300 Nm (222 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2012
Origin country Germany
Average fuel consumption 13.8 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 20 mpg UK)
Views 47.8k
Submitted by Mental

Performance

Top speed 297 kph (185 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.5 s
0 - 100 kph 3.9 s
0 - 200 kph 13.4 s
0 - 60 mph 3.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.3 s
0 - 130 mph 16.1 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.8 s @ 90.7 mph
1/4 mile 12.3 s @ 115.0 mph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 9.5 s
60 mph - 0 30 m (98 ft)
70 mph - 0 45 m (147 ft)
Lateral acceleration 1.05 g (10 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Porsche 911 Carrera 4S acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type Boxer 6, n/a, DOHC, 24v
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 400 ps (395 bhp / 294 kw) @ 7400 rpm
Torque 440 Nm (325 lb-ft) @ 5600 rpm
Power / liter 105 ps (104 hp)
Efficiency 29 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 speed manual / 7 PDK
Layout rear engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 9

911 Carrera 4S rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Thiago_Lins  3y  

0-40 kph: 1.2 s
0-80 kph: 3.1 s
0-100 kph: 4.3 s
0-120 kph: 5.6 s
0-160 kph: 9.4 s
0-180 kph: 11.6 s
0-200 kph: 14.6 s
Hockenheim: 1:11.70

SPORTAUTO

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichstest/porsche-911-carrera-s-vs-carrera-4s-im-vergleich-allrad-oder-heckantrieb-6742000.html?show=4


User avatar

ddd  4y  

3x races (look at second and third race - realy big F12s advantage)...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJwJ66uDung

with the Aventador, supercar that took down Gallardo 560-4 like that :)...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExqedxdXuBc

Anyone believes that F12 is slower than 911 S ?


User avatar

Fgf  4y  

Very unexpected. Porsche is again greater than Ferrari.



User avatar

RSFan  4y  

MT2013- thanks for the link to a great vid... and a lengthy one which makes a change from the usual few minutes....


User avatar

anti-kinder  4y  

more cheating from germans, this makes you wonder if angela merkel has a hand in the best drivers car


User avatar

MT2013  4y  

great vid i enjoyed it and the winner 911 +1 for germany

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDXq9xIYkZ8


User avatar

benzsl  4y  

0-50kph:1,7
0-100kph:4,3
0-130kph:6,5
0-160kph:9,6
0-200kph:15,0
quater miles: 12,38
Oschersleben: 1:45,75

Autobild Sportscar 8/2013


User avatar

DeDe  4y  

0-50 kph: 1,5 s
0-100 kph: 3,9 s
0-200 kph: 13,4 s
HHR short: 1:11,1 min

911 Carrera 4S PDK tested by AutoBild Sportscars


User avatar

Mental  4y  

Some good data for this car:
http://www.autozeitung.de/auto-einzeltest/porsche-911-carrera-4s-test-bilder-und-technische-daten?page=0,1
0-100 kph - 4.0 sec;
0-200 - 13.5 sec.


User avatar

Fester  5y  

Car and driver posted 0-60 time of 3.5sec for 4S..which is 3/10th of a sec quicker than than S...it'd be interesting to see the track data for 4S.


User avatar

Mental  5y  

@Alan
Nordschleife is obviously not the most important track, LOL. I'm pretty sure you say: "How, that's the most legendary track around the world!" Yeah, it's legendary, but actually making such a long tracks and test there cars for time is stupid. It's rather not so much competition between cars, like between racers, cause at the medium track you may make a mistake once, or twice, but not much times and that doesn't influence so much as on long tracks. But exactly on long tracks you may make mistakes on corners much more, and at last you may get tired, and that may make your time worse. Cunninger "energiser" driver > better laptime, even if you had quite much worse car than not experienced racer with brilliant car - that's the rule of Nordschleife.

Just remember von Saurma in Aventador... If there was a driver just Programmed to drive in the best way, the laptime Would be guaranteed to be under 7:10, if even not less! At least I guess so... And that's for all cars!


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

Why most important track? :D
And I can't see Nordschleife time for 4S.


User avatar

Alan  5y  

@eryk03

most important track, nord
S 7:50
4S 8:09


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

What's the problem? Both was on wet...
BTW without wet track still is 3:2 for 4S.


User avatar

Alan  5y  

@Eryk03

wet tracks.....4 points......man...


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

@Piorun Do you want a ban?


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

@Alan yeah right, Carrera S doesn't have big torque but still 4S was quicker on the track than S (although about 100 kg more weight for 4S).

http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/porsche_997_carrera_s_2008_facelift-vs-porsche_997_carrera_4s_facelift.html

4:2 for 4S.


User avatar

Alan  5y  

911's engine is on rear of the car

38:62

RR is right for dry,warm circuit(at least for NA model 911s)


User avatar

Alan  5y  

911 Carrera models doesn't need AWD for dry circuit
AWD is for wet or icy

Turbo model might need AWD because it has turbo engine, it means too much torque to 2 wheels.


User avatar

Alan  5y  

997 Mk II Carrera S - 7:50
997 Mk II Carrera 4S - 8:06

on Nord


User avatar

Mental  5y  

@Alan
From where do you know that 4S is much slower on the track than 2S, if AWD hasn't been tested on any of them! I guess AWD version would be Slightly slower than RWD on the dry track, but on the wet, or snowy track - Carrera 4S would be quite much faster!


User avatar

Mental  5y  

@Eryk03
At least I've found out 0-60 and 0-62 times from another sources:
http://blog.roadandtrack.com/first-look-2013-porsche-911-carrera-4-and-911-carrera-4s/

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/5268/Porsche-911-Carrera-4S.html
4S: 0-60 - 3.9, 0-100 - 4.1 s;
4S Cabrio: 4.1, 4.3;
4: 4.3, 4.5;
4 Cabrio: 4.5, 4.7.


User avatar

BR2,  5y  

...No its not, Jesus you people..In some waays, i cant wait for Dec 21 2012...


User avatar

Alan  5y  

anyway this car is much slower than 911 Carrera S on track


User avatar

BR2,  5y  

All that Brown is hideous, but i like that little strip on the tail lights, id like to see that part on the GT series Porsches.

And SuperCars.Net isnt a Source, they just use Claims, and or older tests. and this car will most likely have the exact same performance as a Carrera.


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

They look very like, that is true, but I can not add without a source.


User avatar

Mental  5y  

Don't know, but I absolutely believe them in almost every occasion! ;)

Also I've got an analysis:
997 2S 997 4S (385 PS)
0-100 4.0 4.3
0-200 14.3 15.6
1/4 11.7 11.8

991 2S 991 4S (400 PS)

0-60 3.5 3.7(supercars'claim)
0-100 3.8 4.1 (sc's claim)
0-200 13.2 13.6 (sc's claim)
1/4 11.8 12.0 (sc's claim)

Conclusion: 0-100 is obviously correct, cause the difference between 997s is 0.3 s, the difference in 991s is also 0.3 s. I'm also sure about all another 991 4S data ;)


User avatar

Eryk03  5y  

The question is, what source have supercars.net? ;)


User avatar

Mental  5y  

Oh yeah, here is an actual performance data for this Porsche:

http://www.supercars.net/cars/5798.html

Top speed (manual gearbox)- 299 kph;
0-60 mph - 3.7 s;
0-100 kph - 4.1 s;
0-200 kph - 13.6 s;
1/4 mile - 12.0 s.