Missing Rival,R34 GTR
Porsche 911 Turbo S (996) specs
Price in Europe | €142,248 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1540-1600 kg (3395-3527 lbs) |
Introduced | 2004 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 16.7 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 17 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 324 g/km |
Views | 40.9k |
Lap times
Performance
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.9 s |
0 - 60 kph | 1.9 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.2 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.1 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.6 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.9 s |
0 - 160 kph | 8.5 s |
0 - 180 kph | 10.8 s |
0 - 200 kph | 13.1 s |
60 - 100 kph | 2.2 s |
80 - 120 kph | 2.4 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.8 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.9 s |
Est. 0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.5 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 100.0 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.9 s |
Top speed | 307 kph (191 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.73 g (7 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 66.1 kph (41.1 mph) |
100 kph - 0 | 34 m (113 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Boxer 6, Twin Turbo, 24v |
Displacement | 3.6 l (220 ci) |
Power | 450 ps (444 bhp / 331 kw) |
Torque | 620 Nm (457 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 125 ps (123 hp) |
Power / weight | 285 ps (281 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 393 Nm (290 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 27 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 16 ps |
Transmission | 6 speed manual |
Layout | rear engine, all wheel drive |
911 Turbo S competition
Georg 16y ago
no... the Leistungskit is a engine perfromance option package that was avaible as option for the standart 996 Turbo (order code X50) from 2002... the 2005 Turbo S has exactly the same engine but it came standart with other stuff that the 996 Turbo did not had in stock trim, like PCCB (ceramic brake).
Anonymous 16y ago
Is the Porsche 996 Turbo Leistungskit same as this car?
Here is a link about the 996 Turbo Leistungskit (Choose the 2003 Porsche 996 Turbo Leistungkit):
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Anonymous 16y ago
Please add these datas:
0-100: 4,1 s
0-160: 8,5 s
0-200: 13,1 s
Reference: Auto Zeitung 08/2005.
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Choose the 2005 996 Turbo S
Thanks!
FastestLaps 17y ago
Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that of all the other tests.
FastestLaps 17y ago
I removed 996 Turbo S Bedford time along with others from this http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php test. Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that of all the other tests.
Anonymous 17y ago
EVO from October 2004 has new times and says that the track was recently revised and is now up to 1.8 miles from 1.7
Anonymous 17y ago
It was probably set on the 2004 track. I have an old EVO from then and the track was slightly shorter. That time is between Porsche 911 GT3 1:19.40 and BMW M3 CSL 1:19.95
A156 17y ago
The reference is good but I also can't belive that 1:19.5. Maybe the conditions were perfect or EVO had a better driver to test the cars. I also suspect that the track was a bit shorter or somehow different from the track where Enzo and GTR were tested; I saw the times in that article http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php and all cars were about 2-3 seconds faster than I would bet! Btw, many cars from that link are not on FastestLaps in Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (pre 06/2008) list.
Anonymous 17y ago
is this bedford autodome time the real deal? cause i find it a lil hard to believe this 996 911 turbo beat the Porsche Carrera GT Mclaren F1 and a Ferrari Enzo and a Nissan GT-R R35 round that track, it just seems a lil odd.
GTR 18y ago
1/4 Mile: 11.9 sec. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suv/163_0310_porsche_cayenne_turbo_9
11_x50/specs_price.html#Scene_2