Porsche Panamera Turbo S (Mk I) specs

0-130 kph: 5.6 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8828888872/

0-120 km/h: 4.9 s
0-140: 6.3 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8828861770/in/photostream/

this car faster than F10 M5 thats amazing

@Shaggy
Sorry. My bad.

That wasn't a compliment.

@Shaggy
Thanks! ;)

Oh, it's you again, nice try, S.

@Shaggy
It is. Wherever you got this, "Vimulator is no source" from, is NOT a source. My dad tells me that whatever the car does anywhere (or on any site), it will do the same thing here in real life.

@ Jason: Vimulator is no source.

0-60 mph: 2.9 seconds
0-100 mph: 6.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 11 seconds at 129 mph
Top speed: 213.5 mph
Source: http://vimulator.com/#/v5/sim/38347

@ Elise racer: You're right, but I wouldn't say always, I've heard scuttlebutt of a supercharged version of the 6.4 liter Hemi in the works. In terms of track performance the Porsche Panamera Turbo S is the fastest sedan in the world right now, there are other sedans that have it beat in top speed, but top speed isn't important on a track.

Porsche will always be faster than Mopar!!

The Panamera Turbo/Turbo S will always be faster than Chrysler 300 SRT8, as the Panamera S/4S/GTS will always be faster than Dodge Charger R/T, as the Panamera V6 will always be faster than standard Chrysler 300, 300C, John Varvatos Limited Edition, etc.

The Porsche Panamera has a unique look, I like it.

i dont think that the panamera looks that bad.
i have seen quite a few in reallife and they seem like a real headturner. i like them.

i guess a lot of people got just brainwashed by topgear

Maybe Panamera is a faster Auto. But it is just a Schreck, I will never take one. And I am a Porsche fan...

SRT8, meaning the Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 SRT8.

The Panamera GTS, Turbo, and the Turbo S are better than the SRT8, F10 M5, CTS-V, RS6, etc.

I heard that the Panamera Turbo S accelerates from 0-200 mph in just 15.1 seconds! Bone stock! The SSC Ultimate Aero XT is capable of 0-200 mph in 15.1 seconds, and the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is capable of 0-200 mph in 22.2 seconds!

@BR2, I'm sorry but your statements are nonsense. I'm afraid you can not afford even the Camaro...

£155,790...With the Competitors i listed, I wouldnt pay that price, Love the Turbo S, but with the gap so big between the M5, and CTS-V, S6, I wouldnt take it, want to but wouldnt.

But theres also another Option to look into, the New Audi B8 RS4, £82,510 Fully, And theres a "Very" Good chance i "Might" take one over all those, the "Only" problem for me, is that its an Estate/Wagon, and that kinda kills my buzz, but definetly something to consider, atleast the wifes considering..

@Eryk03

The S6 does start at £53,995, with all the options its £99,470, and i never have bought a car in standard trim., nor will in start.

An F10 M5 starts at £73,040, but again, i never buy standart trim, and the M5 got to £97,330, which i think is better then the higher priced S6.

And its not because Audi offers better equipment, but they have a bigger options list.

@Monkey

I Have seen a Few CTS-Vs over here, not many, everytime i have found one, the prices were all over the place, anywhere from £40,000 to £70,000, All New...for the same equipment-_- I asked the dealer, but he wouldnt specify the difference in price from his competitors.

Would have loved a Z06 but couldn't justify it since I need a sedan for the family.

And that is the SAME reason why i have not been able to purchase a ZO6 or GT-R Over here, I currently have a 2002 Nissan i bought back in 02, for £25,400 from my dads friend, and i wouldnt Trade it for any car, along with a 2002 Mazda. You can find some Really incredible deals here if you know where tolook, specially on Japanese cars.

Unfortunetly, "Most" Performance American cars are a Bit more expensive in the UK then the US, I even saw one dealership advertising a ZR1 for £165,350! was like wtf? when the ZO6 was realesed here, it was £58,715...Now its pushing 90k..--But i know ppl who can get me a good deal one, but again, the reason for not getting one--

@BR2

I bought a slightly used CTS-V for $48k USD. I had to shop around for a while to find one that was the color I wanted and had the right options but it was worth the wait. I wont buy new because I put so many miles on my cars.

Probably next to impossible to find a good used one overseas.

Its a hell of a good car in all areas. Would have loved a Z06 but couldn't justify it since I need a sedan for the family. Handles and rides like a dream. We have terrible roads here and it smooths them out nicely.

@BR2, what you are tolking about?
S6 starts at £53k and M5 £73k...
Fully retrofitted S6 can cost more because Audi gives you better equipmen.

I would buy one, Only problem is, when i purchase a car, i usually get it with all the options, or atleast all the ones that fit me,usually all, and in my previous post, was 256k Usd (US Site)

Theres also the competitors to look at, the CTS-V and M5(I wouldnt get the E63, too ugly for me) The S6 is an option to...but, coming in at £99,470...yeah i dont think so..Then theres the M5, £97,330, Cheaper then S6.. So its the M5 so far. Then theres the CTS-V,(The UK Cadillac site is horrid, so im using the US one), $72,460, Or £48,580, £55,215(Too be safe) its looking like the V will save you a hell of alot, however, its not completely on how much you Save, But still, the Turbo S is going over £150,000 Fully, n thas quite alot..is it worth triple the Cadillac? Dunno, Ive been in a normal Turbo, and thought it was worth just about every penny, But not Triple a V, but its getting so expensive.

If i was going for interior, its a VERY hard choice choosing between a V and Panamera, Comfort id give the Caddy in my own exp, however, ive really never had a problem with comfort in any car.

But i tell you what, I would chose the Quattroporte S Sport GTS over any sedan that has ever existed, regardless of price, £130k or so, It is just such a Beauty to look at, specially with all YOUR options, Black With WHite Interior! In my eyes, those others are Obsolete.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/porsche/panamera/first-drives/porsche-panamera-turbo-s

The weight is 1995 kg. Please add it.

I just Built my Porsche Panamera Turbo S on Porsche, And it cost $256,090Usd fully loaded(Gringe)...Quite alot of Money..

Ps..My Veriification code was Asstickler...Hilarious..

What is it with Nordschleife laptime? Is this Panamera slower than itself in 0.20 seconds???

0-60mph: 3,3 s
0-100mph: 7,7 s
Quarter mile: 11,5 s @ 122mph
GPS-Vmax.: 191mph (307 km/h)

Source: C&D 08/2012 - http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/CarAndDriver%20-%20Scans%202012/CD082012%20-%20Porsche%20Panamera%20Turbo%20S/2.jpg?t=1340443425

Here are some times

http://www.germancarforum.com/panamera/43732-scans-absc-panamera-turbo-vs-turbo-s-panamera-turbo-s-sport-auto-supertest.html#post569322

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sNYwI_c4NUw