Image of Saleen S7 Twin Turbo

Saleen S7 Twin Turbo specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1250-1346 kg (2756-2967 lbs)
Power / weight 578 ps (570 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 731 Nm (539 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2005
Origin country United States
Views 30.7k

Performance

Top speed 399 kph (248 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.8 s
0 - 100 kph 4.2 s
0 - 200 kph 9.9 s
0 - 300 kph 25.6 s
0 - 30 mph 1.5 s
0 - 40 mph 2.1 s
0 - 50 mph 2.6 s
0 - 60 mph 3.4 s
0 - 70 mph 3.9 s
0 - 80 mph 4.5 s
0 - 90 mph 5.1 s
0 - 100 mph 5.9 s
0 - 110 mph 7.0 s
0 - 120 mph 8.4 s
0 - 130 mph 9.5 s
0 - 140 mph 10.9 s
0 - 150 mph 13.6 s
0 - 160 mph 15.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.4 s @ 113.7 mph
1/4 mile 10.5 s @ 146.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 17.5 s @ 156.0 mph
1 mile 25.9 s @ 206.3 mph
Est. 1000 m 20.1 s @ 267.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 5.7 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 15.7 s
0 - 100 mph - 0 11.2 s
60 mph - 0 34 m (111 ft)
70 mph - 0 48 m (157 ft)
Lateral acceleration 1.04 g (10 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Saleen S7 Twin Turbo acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V-8, 2 valves per cylinder, Twin Turbo
Displacement 7.0 l (427 ci)
Power 750 ps (740 bhp / 552 kw) @ 6300 rpm
Torque 949 Nm (700 lb-ft) @ 4800 rpm
Power / liter 107 ps (106 hp)
Transmission 6
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 1

Track Time
Motortrend Figure-8 0:23.30

S7 Twin Turbo rivals

User avatar



User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

Its different tests fallowed by different drivers on different sources, like, Why bother commenting on something so easy to figure out?....Thas like saying,Hey, This Ice Tea tastes different then this one, Oh wait, Ones from Lipton the other is Nestea..........................


User avatar

Shaggy  2y ago

@Indrick Boreale: Turbo lag, probably.


User avatar

Indrick Boreale  2y ago

This actually takes longer to accelerate to 100 than the normal version on this website? wth


User avatar

Thiago_Lins  2y ago

CAR AND DRIVER TEST

0-40 mph: 2.2 sec.
0-60 mph: 3.4 sec.
0-80 mph: 4.7 sec.
0-100 mph: 6.2 sec.
0-120 mph: 8.4 sec.
0-150 mph: 13.6 sec.
0-160 mph: 15.6 sec.
1/4-Mile: 10.9 sec. @ 140 mph


User avatar

dddd  3y ago

146 mp/h trap speed in 1/4 mile ? We all know that its impossible.


User avatar

BR2+  3y ago

Id take this over ANY Porsche, McLaren, Or Ferrari, Hands down and up, This is more my kind of car, And those looks! Inside and out WITH having extreme function, 7.0L V8, Manual Rwd, That Fkn Sound!!!


User avatar

ProDriveP2  3y ago

Well can we all petition Top Gear to stomp the Porsche 918 with this racing legend and GT40 engine type.


User avatar

phavyarden  3y ago

Different tests


User avatar

ProDriveP2  3y ago

How is the 0-200mph faster than 0-300kph?


User avatar

Guest  5y ago

Someone's mistake has been here for a while. The 1/2 mile trap speed is 176-186 mph, not 156.


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

Its all we have to compare the times. The S7 TT 0-150Mph ranges from slowest of 13.6s, to fastest of 11.0s depending on the test, Same with the slowest 0-200Mph of 35.2s, and Fastest 23.4s, At the 1/4 eveyr S7 TT test has a higher Trap speed then the Veyrons, and theres only one test of the 2 doing the Full mile, where the S7 BEATS it to 200Mph by 1.1s and with a higher trap speed in the mile.(Albeit different day)

There is a .8s difference in 0-100Mph, but after the that Gap doesnt widen, it closes, and fast, The Veyrons faster below 150Mph, After its all S7, what happens past 210Mph, is anyones guess, would the Veyron win because of power/torque/tranny? or would the S7 win because of Weight/aerodynamics?...Cant say ..

@Mental

From a dig the Veyron is faster, around a track I could guarantee it would get destroyed, and I do mean destroyed not beat. The S7 doesn't need a Pro driver, its actually easier to drive then a ZO6, but a good driver is required nonetheless, And the S7 wont be as popular as the Veyron, due to lack of press and company name, but like ive said before, who in there right mind would take a Veyron over this Beautiful Beast? Honestly..


User avatar

Hamcee  5y ago

there are way to many contradictions in order to compare the times.

the veyron hit 0-100mph in 5,1 seconds while the s7 hit 0-100mph in 5,9 seconds.

a difference of 0,8

then, 0-150mph the veyron hit 11,3 and s7 13,6

a difference of 2,3 seconds


User avatar

Mental  5y ago

In acceleration and top speed aspects, my money would be on Veyron, if it ever raced with Saleen. But on the track, I suppose Veyron's ass would be kicked. However, the results highly vary with random drivers. While Bugatti can be driven with one hand, Saleen needs only pro-driver for the win.

But whatever about numbers.. VW has no chance to be more brutal and beloved than S7.


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

Well...It has..theres no head to head direct comparison, but they have both been tested on the same event albeit different days. This S7 has a faster 0-150Mph, and onwards, as proven, Every trap speed in the 1/4 mile has also been faster then the Veyron, slowest to slowest fastest to fastest, so its not Unbelievable in any way that this wouldn't stand a chance or even beat a Veyron at those speeds.

But again, theres no head to had, but its the best we have to go on, and who in there right mind would take a Veyron over this beauty?(Selling one aside)


User avatar

ddd  5y ago

I dont think that this car can beat Veyron...

0-300 in 16s ? Impossible for that car.


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

This beats a Veyron to 150Mph and 200Mph, And has a faster Mile time and trap speed, So why wouldn't this hit 300kph sooner? When the best test of a Veyron hits 300Kph in 16.7s?..


User avatar

Hamcee  5y ago

lol, 15-16 seconds?
never ever, more like 20-21 seconds


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

I dunno if the Aerodynamics are active or adjustable.

But not being able to hit 300Kph and actually hitting the ground is HIGHLY impressive, and hilarious at the same time.

But the reason for the bad 0-100kph time and 300kph time is simple, 2 different tests and 2 different drivers, the driver in the test that recorded a 4.2 0-100kph was bad, he bombed with all the cars in the comparison tests, but the guy who did the better test nailed it, great mile and 200mph time, 0-300kph in most likely high 16s or high 15s given its better test results.

And no, Fangio, its real speed is Much higher then 300kph, dunno the actual setting were on that test DeDe mentioned.

But Fuk me I love this car!


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

@DeDe
So, its real speed is under 300 kph? :D

Or was it a mistake made by the factory? (I think it was)


User avatar

DeDe  5y ago

Technological perfection: when AutoBild tested this car it couldn't reach 300 kph, because the body generated too much downforce and the car actually hit the ground. LOL!


User avatar

Hamcee  5y ago

the kph time is just off, probably due to a bad take off.
it begins with a bad 0-100 time which logically leads to worse 0-200 and 0-300 times.


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

Maybe another setup for the 1/4 mile time? Could be an explanation... Same with the 0-300 kph and 0-200 mph time. Better conditions maybe, too... Hard to find an answer!


User avatar

ddd  5y ago

9,9s 0-200 and 1/4 @ 146 mp/h= 235 km/h in 10,5s ?

Something is wrong...


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

@QA51M
I know. But one is unnecessary, IMO.


User avatar

QA51M  5y ago

they are two individual tests i think


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

Sorry, delete the 0-300 kph or the 0-200 mph, please. One is wrong!


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

Delete the 0-300 kph time, please.


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

Saleen should have never sold his company..

The S7 Is/Was 1 of USA most Incredible cars, It has Beauty, and that American Brutality you dont get from almost No car.

But $3,000,000 Is much to invest in a car or company, and a loan can backfire on you, the few that wer sold here were £287,00 Which was FANTASTIC, would eat everything alive.

But id like to se Saleen back in buisness, making a Ne S8 and the S5S Raptor and its Mustangs, Heres hoping..

Photo of Saleen S7 Twin Turbo

Photo of Saleen S7 Twin Turbo

Timeline

User avatar

Latest topics

Data submission requests 162
1 day ago by serpentx

Porsche 911 GT2 RS sets new Hockenheim record, beats Huracán Performante 12
2 days ago by cosimo

Alexander West takes his LaFerrari FXX K and P1 GTR to Silverstone GP 121
1 week ago by fatpussy

First official look at a near-production ready Aston Martin Valkyrie 33
2 weeks ago by Fastedee

Roll race - 918 vs LT vs 720S vs Chiron vs TDF 24
2 weeks ago by ///

Open letter to YouTube 10
2 weeks ago by FastestLaps

Active users

tyler, skizoman, Inline 6 rules, manone, honzakoubek, DeDe, Hayes, NIN, fakekillerfour, Fastedee, FastestLaps, lp750sv, beefy, QA51M, Dagumi86