@Inline 6, agree with you about this looking more similar to Camaro, than Mustang.
It's interesting, why it was so much heavier (400kg!) than original GT350 from 1965. It must be slower then.
Shelby GT350 specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1633 kg (3600 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.72 m (186 in) long, 1.81 m (71 in) wide, 1.30 m (51 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.74 m (108 in) |
| Introduced | 1969 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Views | 3.2k |
| Submitted by | Super8 |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Ford Windsor 351W V-8 |
| Displacement | 5.8 l (351 ci / 5752 cc) |
| Power | 294 ps (290 bhp / 216 kw) @ 4800 rpm |
| Torque | 522 Nm (385 lb-ft) @ 3200 rpm |
| Power / liter | 51 ps (50 hp) |
| Power / weight | 180 ps (178 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 320 Nm (236 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | Ford 3.25 4 Speed Manual (3.25 ratio) |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
GT350 competition
Inline 6 rules 11y ago
Why does it look so different than the 1969 Mustang? In the 1965-1968 Shelby Mustangs you can clearly discover the Ford Mustangs which they are based on. But in this? For me it's more similar to a first generation Camaro than to a '69 Mustang.
