If a Ford Focus RS and a BMW M140i can't do this result, neither can this car. Top Gear is a joke and should only be taken lightly
Audi RS3 Sportback 0 - 100 mph
Vehicle | Audi RS3 Sportback (8P) |
Power / weight | 340 ps / 1611 kg |
Time | 9.90 s |
Est. distance | 249 m (818 ft) |
Peak acceleration | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
Submitted | 14 years ago by DeDe |
Views | 1.1k |
Reference: TopGear Magazine
CL 65 AMG | 9.8 | -0.1 |
CLS 55 AMG | 9.8 | -0.1 |
SL 55 AMG | 9.9 | -0.0 |
Marcos 500 GT | 9.9 | -0.0 |
Audi RS3 Sportback | 9.9 s | |
Cayenne Coupé S | 10.0 | +0.1 |
Lexus RC F | 10.0 | +0.1 |
V60 T8 eAWD Polestar | 10.0 | +0.1 |
Lotus 2-Eleven | 10.0 | +0.1 |
hostboy 2y ago @Corvolet3
Auto Bild too has been known for providing either inaccurate or ringer results, like 3.14 to 62 for an Enzo, 3.16 to 62 for a C6 ZR1, a 212kph 400m trap speed for a Hellcat, etc etc.
Top Gear had a "stock" DBS Superleggera at a whopping 218kph (!) trap speed as far as 400m trap speeds go. That's higher than any C7 ZR1.
hostboy 2y ago @Corvolet3
That's why it's good to average optimistic and pessimistic results.
Evo sometimes miscalculates quartermile times. When they tested a CCX, it did 3.9 to 60 and 7.7 to 100, but for quartermile they got 12.3. When they tested a C6ZR, it did 3.8 to 60 and 8.1 to 100, but for quartermile they got 12.5. Both cars trapped 132 mph.
Corvolet3 2y ago @hostboy
Lmao, that's exactly what I started doing in the last few months. After a while of checking and accumulating stats you suddenly have your own comparison table and can figure out easier what a specific car can actually achieve.
I'm sure my lists still have a few mistakes here and there, but at least it has a 70-80% accurate overview to use in an actual conversation. 😎