Alfa Romeo 4C vs Alpine A110

Picture of Alpine A110 (Mk II)
Picture of Alfa Romeo 4C
Category Alpine A110 (Mk II)Alfa Romeo 4C
Max power (ps / bhp) 252 / 249240 / 237
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 320 / 236350 / 258
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1109 / 2445895 / 1973
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 227 / 224268 / 264

Performance

Category Alpine A110 (Mk II)Alfa Romeo 4C
0 - 100 kph 4.6 s4.2 s
0 - 180 kph 13.4 s13.4 s
1000 m 23.4 s23.5 s @ 212.0 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph 3.3 s4.6 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 12.2 s15.8 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph 4.5 s4.4 s
1/4 mile 12.7 s12.5 s
Est. max acceleration 0.64 g (6 m/s²)0.65 g (6 m/s²)

Summary

Category Alpine A110 (Mk II)Alfa Romeo 4C
Track Performance 400385
Straight line speed 665682
Total 10651067

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 3.2k times.

User avatar
User avatar

FastestLaps  2y ago

Very interesting matchup. These cars have created their own niche - super-lightweight 4 cylinder turbo sportscars.

 

User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

There are Kei cars..


User avatar

tyler  2y ago

I prefer the Alpine A110 over the 4c

 

User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

Agreed, Its exotic yet it looks clean n simple, i can appriciate that, No fan of that engine though, Shoulda just put the TTRS engine in there..


User avatar

tyler  2y ago @BR2+

They may possibly do that for future variants of the car.


User avatar

andus  2y ago

I prefer 4c better


User avatar

Shmuk  2y ago @andus

Yes, 4C looks much prettier, has a more prestigious badge, a far lighter carbon rub (like a Ferrari), and, despite being made 5 years before the A110, is faster in a straight line and just as fast round the track. Alfa for the win.


User avatar

A110  1y ago @Shmuk

The A110 it's a true drivers car. Inlike the 4C. Read the magazines and you will ser that all say the same thing "The A110 is what the Alfa should be".