My 2006 Mustang GT is everything I ever wanted, but I'm looking to buy a 2006 GTO for my son because I love how they perform!
Pontiac GTO 6.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro SS vs Ford Mustang GT vs Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392
| Category | GTO 6.0 | Camaro SS | Challenger SRT-8 392 | Mustang GT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | V8 | V8 | V8 | V8 |
| Max power (ps) | 400 | 432 | 492 | 426 |
| Max torque (Nm) | 536 | 570 | 644 | 529 |
| Curb weight (kg) | 1702 | 1770 | 1955 | 1717 |
| Power / tonne (ps) | 235 | 244 | 252 | 248 |
Lap Times
| Track | GTO 6.0 | Camaro SS | Challenger SRT-8 392 | Mustang GT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motortrend Figure-8 | 0:26.10 | 0:25.20 | 0:25.40 | 0:24.40 |
Performance
| Category | GTO 6.0 | Camaro SS | Challenger SRT-8 392 | Mustang GT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.6 s | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.8 s | 9.5 s | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
| 1/4 mile | 13.3 s | 12.9 s | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 274 kph | 250 kph | 270 kph | 250 kph |
| Fuel economy | 16.8 l/100 km | 9.4 l/100 km | 11.6 l/100 km | 12.0 l/100 km |
Summary
| Category | GTO 6.0 | Camaro SS | Challenger SRT-8 392 | Mustang GT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 82 | 91 | 89 | 100 |
| Straight line speed | 99 | 89 | 100 | 88 |
| Overall | 93 | 95 | 98 | 100 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 5.9k times.
Acceleration graph
Spartan 6y ago
Not Bad considering the GTO is an 05 and allot older. Challenger is newer with a 392 6.4 engine and you barely beat the Goat? That's embarrassing, remember the 05 GTO is a 6.0
