DSG with launch control, R32 beats the MPS to 60 because of that.
Lap Times 16
Performance
| Golf R32 | 3 MPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| 0 - 100 kph | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 25.2 s | 25.1 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 14.4 s | 13.6 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.6 s @ 82.0 mph | 9.9 s @ 84.5 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 14.4 s | 14.0 s @ 101.3 mph |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 22.8 s @ 119.3 mph | 22.8 s @ 119.9 mph |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 19.2 s | 19.0 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.56 g (6 m/s²) | 0.52 g (5 m/s²) |
Summary
| Golf R32 | 3 MPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 1561 | 1587 |
| Straight line speed | 872 | 866 |
| Total | 2433 | 2453 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 4.8k times.
More acceleration data at dragrace.me
Acceleration graph
Flex 11y ago
One thing to keep in mind is, the MPS is lighter, has 40lbs more torque, and nearly 20bhp more too. So unless the R32 defies physics, it'll be beaten most of the time, apart from a wet surface (AWD helps).
Flex 11y ago
I'm not buying the R32 0-60, I know for a fact that it's about 0.3-0.5 slower then the MPS. Having said that, 5.9 on a good run is possible out of the MPS!
Plus higher up the speed range you're not dragged back by the AWD system.
