I expected this result.
Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV vs Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
Category | Camaro Z/28 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Max power (ps / bhp) | 507 / 500 | 670 / 661 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 637 / 470 | 660 / 487 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1702 / 3752 | 1664 / 3668 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 298 / 294 | 403 / 397 |
Lap Times
Track | Camaro Z/28 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Nürburgring Nordschleife | 7:37.47 | 7:42.00 |
Sachsenring | 1:35.20 | 1:36.29 |
Hockenheim Short | 1:10.80 | 1:09.50 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Camaro Z/28 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
0 - 50 kph | 2.1 s | 1.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.4 s | 3.0 s |
0 - 130 kph | 6.5 s | 4.8 s |
0 - 200 kph | 13.5 s | 9.9 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.1 s | 6.9 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.8 s | 6.8 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.6 s @ 99.4 mph | 7.4 s @ 108.1 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.2 s @ 118.7 mph | 10.9 s |
General performance
Category | Camaro Z/28 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 277 kph (172 mph) | 342 kph (213 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) | 1.03 g (10 m/s²) |
60 mph - 0 | 30 m (100 ft) | 30 m (98 ft) |
Summary
Category | Camaro Z/28 | Murcielago LP 670-4 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 295 | 294 |
Straight line speed | 615 | 1000 |
Total | 909 | 1294 |
Verdict
Murcielago LP 670-4 SV is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 2.5k times.
Acceleration graph



T1r 6y ago
I don't beleive those lambo times, that's a 3.1 o-60 lambo vs a heavy camaro who's o-60 way slower not to mention a way looser suspension. I've seen too many fixed times.

dag johnsen 6y ago
7.42 is reality, the reason is the level of driving dynamics. The more modern Lambos are much faster with better driving dynamics.


