Strange comparison. The Cayman S has almost 100 bhp more than the 4C. Of course it is faster.
Porsche Cayman S vs Alfa Romeo 4C
| Category | Alfa Romeo 4C | Porsche Cayman S |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 240 / 237 | 325 / 321 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 350 / 258 | 370 / 273 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 895 / 1973 | 1320 / 2910 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 268 / 264 | 246 / 243 |
Lap Times
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Alfa Romeo 4C | Porsche Cayman S |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 15.8 s | 11.8 s |
| 1/4 mile | 12.5 s | 12.6 s @ 112.5 mph |
General performance
| Category | Alfa Romeo 4C | Porsche Cayman S |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) | 281 kph (175 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.65 g (6 m/s²) | 0.70 g (7 m/s²) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.00 g (10 m/s²) | 0.99 g (10 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Alfa Romeo 4C | Porsche Cayman S |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 937 | 1000 |
| Straight line speed | 512 | 561 |
| Total | 1449 | 1561 |
Verdict
Cayman S is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 5.4k times.
More acceleration data at dragrace.me
No way! 7y ago
Just a pity that 2013 Cayman s time at Ring it's just a 'rumor' blurt by Rohrl to a minor car webzine, while 4C time is proudly official (and with video also...). It's somehow ridiculous that such 'fancy' (false?!?) time are used from fastestlaps for car comparison... And what about including also Variano times into comparison?
Viking 8y ago
We won't know for sure until some magazines do some lap times for the Alfa. Too early to tell, and I suspect it will also depend on the track. On a big track like VIR, I think the Porsche will win, but on a shorter tighter track the Alpha could win. Too soon to tell, gotta wait for lap times.
Raging Bull 8y ago
Porsche would kill alfa romeo, no doubt about this. Porsche is always a Porsche. Alfa is a good car, but's light years away from Porsche.
