@FastestLaps please make it so the estimate results dont show up in comparisons. I think it's good to have them but if they contribute to the points it kinda riggs it
Lamborghini Huracán LP 610-4 vs Ferrari 488 GTB
| Category | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 5.2 l V10 | 3.9 l V8 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 610 / 602 | 670 / 661 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 560 / 413 | 760 / 561 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1548 / 3413 | 1547 / 3411 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 394 / 389 | 433 / 427 |
| Average price | €211,000 | €247,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration (mph)
| Speed & distance | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 40 mph | 1.5 s | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 3.1 s | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 11.2 s | 10.3 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 13.3 s | 11.8 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 7.3 s @ 109.4 mph | 7.2 s @ 112.5 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 10.4 s @ 135.5 mph | 10.3 s @ 140.3 mph |
| 1/2 mile | 17.6 s @ 156.5 mph | 17.8 s @ 161.6 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| Speed & distance | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.0 s | 1.1 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.1 s | 1.3 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 1.5 s | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 70 kph | 1.8 s | 2.5 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 90 kph | 2.4 s | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 3.6 s | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
| 0 - 150 kph | 5.1 s | 6.0 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 9.0 s | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 240 kph | 13.3 s | 11.8 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 15.3 s | 12.9 s |
| 0 - 280 kph | 21.3 s | 18.7 s |
| 0 - 300 kph | 27.6 s | 23.9 s |
| 1000 m | 19.1 s @ 275.0 kph | 18.7 s @ 283.0 kph |
Rolling acceleration
| Speed | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.0 s | 2.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 2.8 s | 2.1 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.7 s | 2.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.0 s | 3.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.0 s | 4.5 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 5.4 s | 4.2 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 7.3 s | 5.1 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 10.0 s | 6.5 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (7) | 12.1 s | 8.9 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 1.8 s | 2.3 s |
| Est. 200 - 300 kph | 18.2 s | 15.5 s |
Braking distance
| Speed | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| 100 kph - 0 | 30 m (100 ft) | 30 m (97 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 45 m (147 ft) | 47 m (154 ft) |
| 140 kph - 0 | 62 m (205 ft) | 62 m (203 ft) |
| 180 kph - 0 | 101 m (332 ft) | 99 m (325 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 117 m (384 ft) | 111 m (365 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 123 m (403 ft) | 121 m (396 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 44 m (144 ft) | 41 m (135 ft) |
General performance
| Category | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 328 kph (204 mph) | 335 kph (208 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 1.08 g (11 m/s²) | 1.00 g (10 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 72.8 kph (45.2 mph) | 72.2 kph (44.9 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 142.0 kph (88.2 mph) | 139.0 kph (86.4 mph) |
| Fuel economy | 6.5 l/100 km (36 mpg US / 43 UK) | 12.9 l/100 km (18 mpg US / 22 UK) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.02 g (10 m/s²) | 1.02 g (10 m/s²) |
| Downforce @ 200 kph | 10 kg (22 lbs) | 205 kg (452 lbs) |
| Measured power | 631 ps (622 bhp) | 708 ps (698 bhp) |
| Measured torque | 575 Nm (424 lb-ft) | 739 Nm (545 lb-ft) |
Summary
| Category | Huracán LP 610-4 | Ferrari 488 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 98 | 100 |
| Straight line speed | 98 | 100 |
| Overall | 98 | 100 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 38.7k times.
Acceleration graph
jeremyclarkson1 1y ago
@FastestLaps please make it so the estimate results dont show up in comparisons. I think it's good to have them but if they contribute to the points it kinda riggs it
benedekpuskas 6y ago
I think the fuel economy for the Huracán is rather 16.5 liters / 100km than 6.5. mostly because it hasn't got a turbo.
SpeedKing 6y ago
In this 0-342 km/h video of the 488 GTB there is a VBox speedo dispay(albeit somewhat blurry) visible in the top left so that one can compare GPS vs car speedo. When the VBox hits 300 km/h the car speedo reads 312-313 km/h so there's a 4% speedo error compared to the Huracan's 4.5 to 5% error. Anyway at that point the seconds timer display is at 25.5 secs which i reckon is indicative of the car's 0-300 km/h potential. The 100-200 km/h incremental of 5.4 sec is calculated using the car speedo which is of course wrong :)
fakekillerfour 9y ago
Willow Springs
675LT: 1:26.42
Huracán LP610-4: 1:26.54
488 GTB: 1:26.92
Corvette Z06: 1:28.40
jj Lu 10y ago
FL provide very good data for comparison, but real world is more then data comparison when you have to spend a one bedroom condo price on one car. Reliablity, resell, repair cost have is more important then 0.1 second in 1/4 mile for retional buyer. Style and image is most important for buyer love to show off. Lambo should be the best balance. Style and image similar to Ferrari. Reliable Audi engineering to keep running cost down to Porsche level. But that may not be what happen because people do not have sense when they are in $300000+ market.
fakekillerfour 10y ago
This comparison is more fair than the one against the 458 Speciale.
458 Italia - Gallardo LP560-4
458 Speciale - Gallardo LP570-4 SC
488 GTB - Huracan LP610-4
tharne 10y ago
Well what i like about FL is that you don't have to be a member to talk stuff like you said Good Gamer.... I love showing people this site when fans talk mad stuff about their car....I just show them the facts. I used to comment for months till i finally got tired of checking the bot box and became a member which is really easy.... should have done long time ago.
FastestLaps 10y ago
Btw, that boring in gear acceleration data - I will probably start adding it as well. :D
FastestLaps 10y ago
They don't have nowhere near as much laptimes. Only thing they have is more acceleration data, some of it rather less interesting in-gear acceleration times.
Good Gamer 10y ago
I think both have their own pros and cons.
Zeperfs
Pros
1.More data.2.Compares average values rather then best.
3.Can compare 6cars head to head and provides sheets.4.More estoril laptimes.5.Fastest to get data from my observation of two sites,even have laptimes from magazines I find hard to get.
Cons compared to FL
1.Have to create account for viewing more than top 30 figures.2.Registration is in french.3.Account needed for viewing source.4.Poor graphics.5.Only registered members can share opinions.6.Doesn't show weather of track tests.
Good Gamer 10y ago
In fact, you won't find this much data anywhere else.
How does your database compare to this one?
http://www.zeperfs.com/en/
No offense intended just for knowledge purpose.I had found 1:06.7xlaptime of Civic type r there first and the fastest F40 laptime(1:03.73 not 1:03.95) is also more accurate there.
FastestLaps 10y ago
Alex, you can't even spell correctly, and I am supposed to believe that "this data is not real blah blah."
Data you see here is the "most real" data you will get anywhere. In fact, you won't find this much data anywhere else.
