There's something up with those CCX numbers. 0-60 in 3.8, that way slow for this car. Then goes on to pull a 10.5 1/4 mile?? Something is off. Completely believe the F1 is the better track car but straight speed I think CCX wins.
McLaren F1 vs Koenigsegg CCX
| Category | Koenigsegg CCX | McLaren F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 806 / 795 | 627 / 618 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 920 / 679 | 647 / 477 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1456 / 3210 | 1155 / 2546 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 554 / 546 | 543 / 535 |
Lap Times
| Track | Koenigsegg CCX | McLaren F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (2004 - 06/2008) | 1:22.30 | 1:21.20 |
Performance
| Category | Koenigsegg CCX | McLaren F1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
| 0 - 300 kph | 21.9 s | 22.0 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
| Est. 200 - 300 kph | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 7.8 s @ 110.0 mph | 7.4 s @ 108.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 10.5 s @ 145.4 mph | 11.0 s |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 17.5 s @ 172.1 mph | 17.3 s @ 170.3 mph |
| Top speed | 395 kph (245 mph) | 386 kph (240 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.79 g (8 m/s²) | 0.95 g (9 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Koenigsegg CCX | McLaren F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 96 | 100 |
| Straight line speed | 990 | 1045 |
| Total | 1086 | 1145 |
Verdict
F1 is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.8k times.
