BMW M3 vs Audi RS3 Sedan

Picture of Audi RS3 Sedan (8V facelift)
Picture of BMW M3 (F80)
Category Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
Engine layout 2.5 l R53.0 l R6
Max power (ps / bhp) 400 / 395431 / 425
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 480 / 354550 / 406
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1564 / 34481607 / 3543
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 256 / 252268 / 265
Average price €65,000€82,000

Acceleration (mph)

Speed & distance Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
0 - 30 mph 1.5 s1.7 s
0 - 40 mph 2.1 s2.5 s
0 - 50 mph 2.9 s3.2 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s3.8 s
0 - 70 mph 4.7 s5.0 s
0 - 80 mph 5.9 s6.1 s
0 - 90 mph 7.1 s7.4 s
0 - 100 mph 8.8 s8.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile 8.4 s @ 100.0 mph8.6 s @ 98.8 mph
1/4 mile 11.8 s @ 117.3 mph12.0 s @ 119.3 mph

Acceleration (kph)

Speed & distance Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
0 - 40 kph 1.2 s1.5 s
0 - 50 kph 1.5 s1.6 s
0 - 100 kph 3.7 s4.1 s
0 - 130 kph 5.9 s6.0 s
0 - 160 kph 8.7 s8.5 s
0 - 200 kph 13.7 s13.3 s

Rolling acceleration

Speed Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
60 - 100 kph (4) 3.6 s3.3 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 5.3 s4.4 s
80 - 120 kph (4) 3.8 s3.7 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 4.6 s4.2 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 6.2 s5.3 s
80 - 120 kph (7) 9.5 s7.6 s
80 - 160 kph (4) 8.1 s7.2 s
80 - 160 kph (5) 10.8 s9.2 s
80 - 160 kph (6) 14.3 s11.6 s
80 - 160 kph (7) 19.7 s16.2 s

General performance

Category Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
Top speed 280 kph (174 mph)284 kph (176 mph)
Est. max acceleration 0.82 g (8 m/s²)0.72 g (7 m/s²)
18m slalom 69.8 kph (43.4 mph)71.1 kph (44.2 mph)
Fuel economy 8.1 l/100 km (29 mpg US / 35 UK)7.3 l/100 km (32 mpg US / 39 UK)
Lateral acceleration 0.95 g (9 m/s²)1.01 g (10 m/s²)
100 kph - 0 34 m (111 ft)33 m (107 ft)
200 kph - 0 139 m (455 ft)134 m (438 ft)
60 mph - 0 33 m (109 ft)30 m (99 ft)

Summary

Category Audi RS3 SedanBMW M3 (F80)
Track Performance 95100
Straight line speed 10094
Overall 99100

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 2.5k times.

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

Fastedee  9y ago

The RS3 is supposed to start at 63k up here while an m2 starts at 53k.Though in terms of handling the M2 could more than equal the previous rs3.
Both are a better value than a Giulia Ti up here in Ontario. Only 280 bhp for 51k while a QV can get to 90k easy. Pretty cars but quite a premium for slightly more performance. Indeed an M3 was virtually tied with the QV on the Top Gear Track.

Reply
745  

User avatar

Fastedee  9y ago

Should be well matched

Reply
665  

User avatar

saxy  9y ago

Should be M2 vs RS3. M3 vs RS4

Reply +1
584  

Timeline