Audi R8 V10 Performance vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S

Picture of Audi R8 V10 Performance (Mk II facelift)
Picture of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S (X290)
Category R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
Engine layout 5.2 l V104.0 l V8
Max power (ps / bhp) 620 / 612639 / 630
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 580 / 428900 / 664
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1646 / 36292112 / 4656
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 377 / 372303 / 298
Average price €210,000€183,000

Acceleration

Speed & distance R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
0 - 40 kph 1.1 s1.0 s
0 - 50 kph 1.3 s1.2 s
0 - 80 kph 2.2 s2.2 s
0 - 100 kph 2.9 s3.0 s
0 - 130 kph 4.3 s4.5 s
0 - 150 kph 5.6 s6.0 s
0 - 160 kph 6.0 s6.6 s
0 - 180 kph 7.4 s8.2 s
0 - 200 kph 9.0 s10.2 s
0 - 250 kph 14.8 s17.6 s
0 - 280 kph 21.2 s25.1 s
0 - 300 kph 28.9 s35.8 s
1000 m 19.4 s @ 273.0 kph20.0 s @ 262.5 kph
Est. 1/8 mile 7.4 s @ 109.4 mph7.6 s @ 106.9 mph
1/4 mile 10.6 s @ 134.5 mph10.7 s @ 129.0 mph
Est. 1 mile 28.5 s @ 183.9 mph29.6 s @ 179.0 mph

Rolling acceleration

Speed R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
60 - 100 kph (4) 3.9 s2.2 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 5.3 s3.4 s
80 - 120 kph (4) 3.9 s2.3 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 5.2 s3.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 7.1 s4.0 s
80 - 120 kph (7) 10.9 s5.4 s
80 - 160 kph (4) 7.6 s5.0 s
80 - 160 kph (5) 10.7 s6.3 s
80 - 160 kph (6) 15.3 s8.1 s
80 - 160 kph (7) 25.6 s10.3 s
80 - 120 kph 1.6 s1.8 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 20.4 s25.2 s

Braking distance

Speed R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
50 kph - 0 9 m (31 ft)9 m (29 ft)
100 kph - 0 32 m (104 ft)32 m (105 ft)
130 kph - 0 55 m (179 ft)55 m (181 ft)
200 kph - 0 120 m (393 ft)128 m (421 ft)

General performance

Category R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
Top speed 331 kph (206 mph)315 kph (196 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 10.4 s @ 745 ft10.9 s @ 791 ft
Est. max acceleration 0.99 g (10 m/s²)1.00 g (10 m/s²)
18m slalom 72.2 kph (44.9 mph)70.4 kph (43.7 mph)
Fuel economy 10.9 l/100 km (22 mpg US / 26 UK)11.1 l/100 km (21 mpg US / 25 UK)

Summary

Category R8 V10 PerformanceAMG GT 63 S
Track Performance 299299
Straight line speed 34414128
Total 37414428

Verdict

AMG GT 63 S is the fastest by a small margin.

This comparison has been viewed 1.6k times.

User avatar
User avatar

benedekpuskas  1y ago

With the rolling acceleration data in the comparisons, the R8 will lose even against a Suzuki Vitara lol

 

User avatar

marc  2m ago

those rolling stats from high gear are so dumb NA engines get ****ed up hard


User avatar

Cauf40f50  1y ago

Yeah sure totally the amg is faster at straights sure

Fastest laps your lazy **** fix this

 

User avatar

hostboy  2m ago

It's not just about launching numbers. The rolling numbers through different gears is what makes the GT63 faster overall. The GT63 has the turbos and the torque advantage.


User avatar

Lambolover  2m ago @hostboy

If you mean rolling acceleration in 7th gear then yeah right


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @Lambolover

Comparing rolling acceleration between NA and turbo engines and using that as a metric to determine overall superiority is vacuous nonsense...


User avatar

dr. cosimo   2m ago @hostboy

dave chappelle is being attacked for speaking out the truth and making sure nobody gets dragged into the latest bs by liberal ideology aka democ-rats

https://www.thedailybeast.com/dave-chappelle-addresses-backlash-to-transphobic-jokes


User avatar

hostboy  2m ago @dr. cosimo

Isn't he a Democrat?? and also so is Bill Maher.. both even voted for Joe Biden


User avatar

dr. cosimo  2m ago @hostboy

so many were democ-rats, until they released taxes and gas prices are on the rise lol


User avatar

dr. cosimo  2m ago @dr. cosimo

realized


User avatar

hostboy  2m ago @dr. cosimo

Why are neocons so obsessed with gas prices? That's not even a political thing. I hate when everything is politicized. As someone who voted for Trump, people like you really give us a bad name. By the way, gas prices were lower at the end of Obama's presidency.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2019/01/11/gasoline-prices-under-presidents-bush-obama-and-trump/?sh=466bc8871f71

294afda8edb2.png?550x800m