Audi TT 3.2 quattro vs VW Golf R32

Picture of Audi TT 3.2 quattro (Mk I)
Picture of VW Golf R32 (Mk V)
Category Audi TT 3.2 quattroVW Golf R32 (Mk V)
Engine layout 3.2 l V63.2 l V6
Max power (ps / bhp) 250 / 247250 / 247
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 320 / 236320 / 236
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1520 / 33511510 / 3329
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 164 / 162166 / 163

Performance

Category Audi TT 3.2 quattroVW Golf R32 (Mk V)
0 - 100 kph 6.0 s6.0 s
0 - 200 kph 26.2 s25.2 s
0 - 100 mph 14.8 s14.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile 10.0 s @ 85.1 mph10.1 s @ 84.5 mph
1/4 mile 14.6 s14.4 s
Est. 1/2 mile 23.9 s @ 121.2 mph23.8 s @ 121.8 mph
Top speed 250 kph (155 mph)250 kph (155 mph)
Est. max acceleration 0.53 g (5 m/s²)0.51 g (5 m/s²)

Summary

Category Audi TT 3.2 quattroVW Golf R32 (Mk V)
Track Performance 469496
Straight line speed 776786
Total 12451282

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 4.3k times.

User avatar
User avatar

Georg  12y ago

the weight balance is almost identical, the R32 is much more tested than the TT 3.2 the reason why it has better acceleration numbers (more tests = higher chance for good results). The different tires make the different in track perfromance, the TT 3.2 was fitted with Conti Sport Contact which are good allrounder but no real race track tires and the R32 with Michelin Pilot Sport


User avatar

PhantomPorsche  13y ago

The audi has really poor weight distribution


User avatar

phavyarden  13y ago

maybe the tires are wider, thre's a few difference in the weight and.. i don't know xD, is pretty strange xD


User avatar

hahaha fuck off  13y ago

TT v r32. Same engine? same drivetrain? and same power output? Why is the r32 faster?


User avatar

Wads  13y ago

**** off

Said the quick witted TT owner!


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

**** off