Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano vs Lamborghini Murcielago LP640

Picture of Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano
Picture of Lamborghini Murcielago LP640
Category 599 GTB FioranoMurcielago LP640
Engine layout 6.0 l V126.5 l V12
Max power (ps / bhp) 620 / 612640 / 632
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 608 / 448660 / 487
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1771 / 39041805 / 3979
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 350 / 345355 / 350

Acceleration (mph)

Speed & distance 599 GTB FioranoMurcielago LP640
0 - 100 mph 6.8 s7.0 s
0 - 150 mph 15.3 s15.2 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.7 s @ 106.9 mph7.6 s @ 107.5 mph
1/4 mile 11.2 s @ 131.0 mph11.2 s @ 128.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 18.2 s @ 160.3 mph18.1 s @ 159.1 mph
Est. 1 mile 28.8 s @ 184.5 mph28.9 s @ 182.7 mph

Acceleration (kph)

Speed & distance 599 GTB FioranoMurcielago LP640
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s1.4 s
0 - 100 kph 3.4 s3.2 s
0 - 130 kph 5.2 s4.9 s
0 - 200 kph 10.3 s10.2 s
0 - 250 kph 18.7 s17.9 s
0 - 300 kph 29.9 s31.5 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 6.9 s7.0 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 19.6 s21.3 s

General performance

Category 599 GTB FioranoMurcielago LP640
Top speed 335 kph (208 mph)340 kph (211 mph)
Est. max acceleration 0.89 g (9 m/s²)0.96 g (9 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration 0.98 g (10 m/s²)1.05 g (10 m/s²)
60 mph - 0 32 m (105 ft)33 m (108 ft)

Summary

Category 599 GTB FioranoMurcielago LP640
Track Performance 769763
Straight line speed 17011742
Total 24692505

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 3.9k times.

More acceleration data at dragrace.me

User avatar

User avatar

ferrariboy  7y ago

Im Suprised,But Not Disappointed,The Ferrari 599 was One of The Best GT Cars.


User avatar

Karthick01  8y ago

I Never Knew That The 599 is Faster Than LP640.


User avatar

Fangio Man  8y ago

@ddd
His name speaks for himself.


User avatar

ddd  8y ago

[image redacted]


User avatar

ddd  8y ago

Rotfl....599 was the best GT car in its time. And it is one of the best modern Ferrari. And it is a way more comfortable, easier to drive than Murci etc..

Ur post is so absurd that mayby you are just trolling ?


User avatar

hanswurst  8y ago

murcialago isnt a supersports car.
its actually really comfortable.

the 599 was kind of a failure, the 599 gto sounds and looks good, but basemodel does neither


User avatar

JayKarthi  8y ago

How Do You Calculate Straight Line Speed Points ?


User avatar

ddd  8y ago

@ ofc Murcielago.


User avatar

ddd  8y ago

@Iggz Lambo should be faster on tracks...Gallardo is a hardcore supersport car while 599 is a super GT car that is way more comfortable, luxurious and easier to drive than Gallardo.


User avatar

Iggz  8y ago

Ferrari may win a drag but lambo is generally faster on a track. Finito! No need to mentally go back to second grade for this


User avatar

Mr.Devil  8y ago

@ddd: Are you talking to me? Hei, are you talking to me? Please, back to the clinic, and take your daily Roipnol dose.


User avatar

ddd  8y ago

Could you stop writing ur nonsens please ?

Do you take Haloperidol ?


User avatar

JayKarthi  8y ago

Real World LP640 Faster Than 599 GTB
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zShDBadMyk


User avatar

Mr.Devil  8y ago

It's clearly faster Lamborghini. I don't think Ferrari may be declared winner of the match, notwithstanding what's written here.


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

Yes, I implied both were ringers, and one only needs to look at this to understand it:
http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/l2rha11jf80u


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

I was researching a bit the tests of this two and found some interesting things but first: Both claim 0-200 in 11s with Ferrari claiming the 0-100 in 3.7 and Lambo in 3.4.

I found 7 tests for the LP640:
*1 was slow with 12s to 200 and a 100-200 over 8s;
*5 got low 11s to 200 and 100-200 of 7.6 +-0.2s, 7.6 being what Lamborghini claimed and I found that pretty neat
*However the last one, from 4R and the source of the stats here, got my attention. 100-200 in 7 flat and 0-200 in 10.2...

How curious, that's as fast as the fastest test of the SV...

Now on to the 599; 6 tests:
*3 of those got to 200 in the low 11s, one was a bit below 11s but it also had a better launch than claimed, so this 4 had a 100-200 of 7.35 +-0.15, 7.3 being the claimed acceleration.

The last two, like in the Lambos case, seemed out of place, from AMS and 4R (I believe it is the same test car) with the AMS one being the source of most of the stats here. And now the interesting part. 0-200 in 10.3, 100-200 in 6.8...


User avatar

Bernardo  10y ago

Fantastic!!!