Honda Civic Type-R vs Honda Civic Type-R

Picture of Honda Civic Type-R (EP3)
Picture of Honda Civic Type-R (FN2)
Category Honda Civic Type-RHonda Civic Type-R
Engine layout 2.0 l R42.0 l R4
Max power (ps / bhp) 200 / 197201 / 198
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 196 / 145193 / 142
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1246 / 27471355 / 2987
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 161 / 158149 / 146

Performance

Category Honda Civic Type-RHonda Civic Type-R
0 - 100 kph 6.8 s6.8 s
0 - 200 kph 28.4 s29.9 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 21.6 s23.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph 6.3 s6.3 s
0 - 100 mph 16.0 s15.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 10.5 s @ 81.4 mph10.5 s @ 81.4 mph
1/4 mile 15.1 s14.9 s
Est. 1/2 mile 24.9 s @ 119.3 mph25.2 s @ 118.1 mph
Top speed 235 kph (146 mph)235 kph (146 mph)
Est. max acceleration 0.46 g (4 m/s²)0.47 g (5 m/s²)

Summary

Category Honda Civic Type-RHonda Civic Type-R
Track Performance 562590
Straight line speed 988964
Total 15501554

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 7.7k times.

More acceleration data at dragrace.me

User avatar

User avatar

Rich  1w ago

Both type R's are great! I prefer the MK2 fn2 as interior design, digital dash, rev counter, general build quality feels better. I think the extra weight in the fn2 to accommodate more luxury is worth the 0.01 seconds that no one will ever really notice. Ok the MK2 wasn't at the time the leap everyone expected, but the refinements are excellent. Ok it's a tad more domesticated interior wise, bigger boot/space ect. But the Honda quality inside and out is a massive leap. Inside the Fn2 you are wrapped up in Honda type R attention to detail on another level. The fn2 for me while not a leap in pure performance, it's a big refinement of the ep3. Both cars are quality.

 

User avatar

Rich  1w ago

The truth is all of us type R fan boys and gals probably wouldn't be disappointed in either model. The only difference is which one people prefer to live with in everyday use. They both absolutely maintain the same pedegree, and performance is split by a hair.


User avatar

???  1y ago

Both great cars and performance wise there's nothing in it!

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  1y ago

EP3 is classic, FN2 is not (at least today) and was always overshadowed by Japanese Type R.


User avatar

tsso81   1y ago @FastestLaps

All type r's are great driver cars


User avatar

Mark   4m ago @FastestLaps

Yet the ep has 12bhp/ton more, is considerably lighter, and is considered a classic yet its a full 3 seconds slower round the top gear track!


User avatar

Smithy  1m ago @Mark

Ep3 was a wet lap, fn2 was a dry lap.. Considering the ep3 would have been about 5 seconds faster


User avatar

ChelseaDominate  5y ago

Everyone knows the EP3 was a better car. Weight guys matters, and the EP3 was a lightweight. I have a EP3 and race FN2 all the time. So please do not tell me which car is superior.


User avatar

Anonimity is Great  11y ago

Actually, I think it\'s FN2 that is a pregnant Jazz. They both share similar chassis configuration, rear trailing arm suspension and fuel tank placed in the middle of the car (rather than at the back, close to the rear wheel). The EP3 sports fully independent, multi link rear suspension (IIRC) and fuel tank in the right location.


User avatar

Doma  11y ago

Damn right FN2 is noticeably faster. EP3 is a pregnant Jazz.